W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Important Question re. WebID Verifiers & Linked Data

From: Patrick Logan <patrickdlogan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:45:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD_aa-_e2cknMrQ4Hx9fs+Cv4h3d3Db8P78oO4kBinKqtkxvhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
See below...

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote:

> On 21 Dec 2011, at 14:58, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> >
> > Please understand that RDF != Linked Data. It's just one of the options
> for creating and publishing Linked Data.
> I think it would be very nice to have a formal spec on what Linked Data
> is. We do have a few for
> RDF.

Yes, please. I understand the RDF-related specifications. And I understand
the general notion of "linked data". I am someone following the WebID
effort, and who is contemplating the costs and benefits of supporting it in
my products at some point.

Unless I see a WebID specification (or a more general "world-wide linked
data specification") for how to support linked data beyond RDF, how can I
estimate the costs and benefits of supporting linked data beyond RDF?

Please understand that "publishing and consuming any and all possible
interpretations of 'linked data'" is probably impossible.

So what are the specific requirements?

Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 20:46:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:50 UTC