On 23 Dec 2011, at 06:44, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1. I do not see any issues off hand for moving Turtle forward. What is next?
>
> could you ask on the LinkedData list, or find some way of getting people
> there to vote? Well turtle support will get full support I believe,
> but the more difficult question is after that should one drop RDF/XML as a must
> support? Or should one have both? I don't find it difficult to do both.
>
> We should leave RDF/XML as a MUST (on verifier side), even for all its cons, most libs support it (I don't know of any RDF lib which support Turtle but RDF/XML for example). If anything, we could simply remove the ugly RDF/XML snippet from the spec.
Ah that's a good idea.
MUST support by consumer, deprecate for user.
I like the idea.
Henry