- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:05:39 -0500
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EF31D13.6040705@openlinksw.com>
On 12/21/11 7:08 PM, Peter Williams wrote: > > > _http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1J7_ suggests a necessary bug fix, so openilink > with webid/openid can talk to Azure - and then realty, and everywhere > realty reaches as bridging IDP (which is a LONG WAY). > well done, Kingsley (and team). Good days work, connecting the > semantic web to reality (and realty). Peter, Re., question posed in your post, it should be: http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0/server . The issue has been fixed. Also, did you verify you WebID using the verifier at: http://id.myopenlink.net/ods/webid_demo.html ? Kingsley > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: home_pw@msn.com > To: kidehen@openlinksw.com; foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; > public-xg-webid@w3.org > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:42 -0800 > Subject: RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service > > > > I tried it with sourcforge, and the result was the same as with an > RPX-powered (at amazone) RP. > > I also tried to bind the openlink IDP (with webid) to the Azure > bridge, but failed; as summarized here: _http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1J7_ > > The site really needs to be (and claim to be) v2. Ill guess this is > the crux of the issues. > > but, it all looks good. Just some minor fiddles required, I suspect. > Wont be long before webid is (indirectly) powering a SAML2 protocol > exchange to the academic networks. of course, they have had client > certs and https client authn inducing a SAML exchange for years (in a > profile focussed on ldap as the repository of the graph). But, this > will be cuter; as its all native semweb. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: home_pw@msn.com > To: kidehen@openlinksw.com; foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; > public-xg-webid@w3.org > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:46:48 -0800 > Subject: RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service > > Which RP site should I try, ideally? > > My trial results, at _http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1Im_ > > > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:36:45 -0500 > > From: kidehen@openlinksw.com > > To: foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; public-xg-webid@w3.org > > Subject: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service > > > > All, > > > > I've dropped a note about the above at: http://goo.gl/zC7tP . > > > > It's basically a decoupling of what we had in ODS re. WebID+OpenID > > delivered in a manner similar to: http://openid4.me . > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Kingsley Idehen > > Founder& CEO > > OpenLink Software > > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 12:06:15 UTC