[event] Internet Identity Workshop XV in Mountain View - CA on 23/25 Oct
W3C WebCrypto meeting minutes
Suggestions on high-level API - perhaps a meeting next week?
- Re: Suggestions on high-level API - perhaps a meeting next week?
[W3C Web Crypto WG] a post on our API
On specifying algorithms
feedback from CFRG
Privacy Interest Group to review Web Crypto API - a draft
W3C Web Crypto WG - 3GPP & Usage of GBA from the browser
W3C - TPAC 2012 Plenary Schedule (and other reminders)
W3C Web Crypto WG - blog post
W3C Web Crypto - classifying issues - a new proposal
W3C Web Crypto WG - Is our deliverable doomed ?
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Is our deliverable doomed ?
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Is our deliverable doomed ?
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Is our deliverable doomed ?
- Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Is our deliverable doomed ?
RE: suggest to move weekly concall time from UTC 19:00 to different time.
Non Repudiation via WebCrypto API
ISSUE-40: How should we define key discovery, noting asynchronicity
Quotes for blogpost over WebCrypto
Call for Exclusions: Web Cryptography API (from: ij@w3.org)
[W3C Web Crypto WG] FPWD Web Crypto API - available
[W3C Web Crypto WG] Request transition for FPWD on Web Crypto API - approved
Re: crypto-ISSUE-18: Should it be possible to perform CryptoOperations as a 'streaming' operation with URI semantics? [Web Cryptography API]
Fwd: [therightkey] Certificate Transparency WG
W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for 10th of september call - today
- [minutes] Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - 10th of september call -
- W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for 17th of september call - today
W3C Web Crypto WG - closing actions 13/38/44/39/43 - proposal
W3C Web Crypto - status on pending ISSUE-3 related to algo discovery ?
New Version Published
crypto-ISSUE-39: Add abort() to the KeyOperation interface [Web Cryptography API]
W3C Web Crypto WG - Take Away from the 4th of Sept conference call
ArrayBuffer v ArrayBufferView (was JS examples)
JS code examples for ACTION 43
- Re: JS code examples for ACTION 43
- Re: JS code examples for ACTION 43
- Re: JS code examples for ACTION 43
- Re: JS code examples for ACTION 43
Inclusion of rsaes-pkcs1
Draft minutes, 9/4 call
RE: New Editor's Draft Published
[W3C Web Crypto WG] comment on API draft section 5.4
Re: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for 4th of sept call - today
RE: crypto-ISSUE-37: Method naming [Web Cryptography API]
RE: crypto-ISSUE-21: Requiring Content-Security-Policy [Web Cryptography API]
RE: crypto-ISSUE-38: Key initialization and "finalization" [Web Cryptography API]
RE: crypto-ISSUE-31: Problems with keys attribute of the Crypto interface [Web Cryptography API]
RE: (Minor) New version published
RE: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
- Re: Use Cases | ACTION-13 Revisited
RE: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
- RE: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
- Re: ISSUE-17: Key Attributes - Proposed resolution
RE: crypto-ISSUE-27 (aes ctr): Specification of AES-CTR mode counter bits [Web Cryptography API]
RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- RE: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
- Re: crypto-ISSUE-30 (where is the key ?): How does the application know where the key is stored ? [Web Cryptography API]
Regrets for today's meeting
Re: Support for ECB
- RE: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- RE: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- RE: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- RE: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Support for ECB - proposal for a decision
- RE: Support for ECB - proposal for a decision
- Re: Support for ECB - proposal for a decision
- Re: Support for ECB - proposal for a decision
- RE: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB - proposal for a decision
- Re: Support for ECB - proposal for a decision
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB
- Re: Support for ECB