Re: feedback from CFRG

Thanks to Tibor Jager for the review comments.

Ryan is right. The current low-level API is designed for developers
who understand the difference between PKCS #1 v1.5 and RSA OAEP, and
the problems with encryption without message authentication code. It'd
be a good idea to add a short paragraph to the Security Considerations
section about such issues (I seem to recall such a paragraph already
exists -- perhaps it just needs to be edited), but the API
specification needs to be mainly about specifying the API.

Wan-Teh

Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 23:52:08 UTC