Adam Bradley
Adam Miller
Ade Bateman
Adrian Hope-Bailie
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Monday, 18 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicilty (#446) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Payments Drafts Review (#109) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicilty (#446) (Thursday, 7 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Support a way for an app to be installed explicitly? (#446) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Tuesday, 5 April)
Aleksey Shvayka
Alex Russell
Ali Juma
aliams
Andrea Marchesini
Andreas Bovens
Andres Rios
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add dispatcherEvent for callbacks (#489) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add dispatcherEvent for callbacks (#489) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add dispatcherEvent for callbacks (#489) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add dispatcherEvent for callbacks (#489) (Thursday, 28 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Add dispatcherEvent for callbacks (#489) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Remove the reference attachedCallback in example (#487) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Large custom element spec rewrite to implement some F2F decisions (d95392f) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Remove the reference attachedCallback in example (#487) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Tuesday, 5 April)
Andrew Betts
Andrew Sutherland
Andy Earnshaw
Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: add <code> back to the Events section (28689ed) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow tree event processing model (#485) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define event retargeting for shadow trees (#240) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define event retargeting for shadow trees (#240) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove about:unicorn (#147) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove about:unicorn (#147) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add dispatcherEvent for callbacks (#489) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define event retargeting for shadow trees (#240) (Thursday, 28 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define event retargeting for shadow trees (#240) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] URNbis documents (#117) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Synchronous XMLHttpRequest (#69) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Synchronous XMLHttpRequest (#69) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] should fetch() allow no-cors cross-origin HEAD request? (#278) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove isindex handling (#116) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] null for response in case of invalid JSON (#68) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] null for response in case of invalid JSON (#68) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Set the HTTPS state to 'modern' for more things (#290) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define underlying infrastructure (#33) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Set the HTTPS state to 'modern' for more things (#290) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- [whatwg/xhr] Allow synchronous withCredentials (#67) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Crispy cono asv (#46) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Credentials flag text in "CORS-preflight fetch" is unnecessarily convoluted (#279) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove double-negative in CORS-preflight fetch credentials tags (#288) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove double-negative in CORS-preflight fetch credentials tags (#288) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Credentials flag text in "CORS-preflight fetch" is unnecessarily convoluted (#279) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define underlying infrastructure (#33) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] clarify that Clients.matchAll() only returns Window Client objects with active documents (#888) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Remove the reference attachedCallback in example (#487) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Remove the reference attachedCallback in example (#487) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Add the "bluetooth" permission, linked to [web-bluetooth]. (#88) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Permissions API integration needs to be improved (#19) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Remove the reference attachedCallback in example (#487) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Large custom element spec rewrite to implement some F2F decisions (d95392f) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove double-negative in CORS-preflight fetch credentials tags (#288) (Friday, 22 April)
- [whatwg/url] Remove isindex handling (#116) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Improve the comment about blob URL origins. (#115) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Improve the comment about blob URL origins. (#115) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Clarify relation to existing storage APIs (#24) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Clarify relation to existing storage APIs (#24) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Classify cookies as site storage (#8) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Add example for estimate() (#20) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Rework definitions in "Quota" section / API steps for estimate (#22) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Default box type: change from "atomic" to... ? (#21) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Classify cookies as site storage (#8) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove double-negative in CORS-preflight fetch credentials tags (#288) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Re-add FileReader.readAsBinaryString() ? (#39) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] annotations to mutating methods (#235) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] annotations to mutating methods (#235) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove 'passive' from the event listener key (#236) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify how image objects should be fetched (#443) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove 'passive' from the event listener key (#236) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove 'passive' from the event listener key (#236) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] annotations to mutating methods (#235) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: flip non-null/otherwise conditions (#234) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: flip non-null/otherwise conditions (#234) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped need changes (#486) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Should send() throw if the XHR object's window's document is not fully active? (#65) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped need changes (#486) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify the meaning of "" for ReferrerPolicy (#226) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify the meaning of "" for ReferrerPolicy (#226) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Should send() throw if the XHR object's window's document is not fully active? (#65) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Make sure all the dfn-type definitions are exported (#233) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: flip non-null/otherwise conditions (#234) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [w3c/FileAPI] Use Encoding's "UTF-8 encode" hook (#37) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Stop storing the global object on XMLHttpRequest twice (#64) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Stop storing the global object on XMLHttpRequest twice (#64) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [whatwg/xhr] Stop storing the global object on XMLHttpRequest twice (#64) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] utf-8 decoder lead byte switch branches 0xE0 to 0xEF, 0xF0 to 0xF4 need 'return continue' (#42) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Fix regression in utf-8 decoder (#45) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Fix regression in utf-8 decoder (#45) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] " readonly attribute boolean bubbles;" (#232) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped make sense (#486) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] " readonly attribute boolean bubbles;" (#232) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] " readonly attribute boolean bubbles;" (#232) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define the timing when distribution happens (#73) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Fix regression in utf-8 decoder (#45) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [whatwg/encoding] Fix regression in utf-8 decoder (#45) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add term "shadow-including ancestor"? (#225) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Updates to element creation and cross-references (#231) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Updates to element creation and cross-references (#231) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix #227: Make createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw (#230) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix #227: Make createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw (#230) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] utf-8 decoder lead byte switch branches 0xE0 to 0xEF, 0xF0 to 0xF4 need 'return continue' (#42) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix #227: Make createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw (#230) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/encoding] Document buffer tricks? (#44) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix #227: Make createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw (#230) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] SVGEvent is only Gecko, Blink also has SVGEvents (#228) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] SVGEvent is only Gecko, Blink also has SVGEvents (#228) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "event . cancelable Returns true or false depend..." (#226) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Rename simple header to cors-preflight request-header (#286) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Rename simple header to cors-preflight request-header (#286) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Rename simple header (#277) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Editorial: create an element's "new element" step (#463) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Editorial: create an element's "new element" step (#463) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add term "shadow-including ancestor"? (#225) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "convert nodes into a node" needs to specify which document is used as the owner document for the nodes it creates (#224) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "convert nodes into a node" needs to specify which document is used as the owner document for the nodes it creates (#224) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "convert nodes into a node" needs to specify which document is used as the owner document for the nodes it creates (#224) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] URLUtils is wrong for Location object (#61) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] URLUtils is wrong for Location object (#61) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define attachShadow() for custom elements (#223) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Rename simple header (#277) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Friday, 15 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define attachShadow() for custom elements (#223) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Write a formatting guide (#276) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only-if-cached (#159) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should be more explicit about accessing internal body on opaque Responses (#710) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Please rename things that are legacy so it's clear they are (#100) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request.cache reflect non-fetch browser cache controls? (#875) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should be more explicit about accessing internal body on opaque Responses (#710) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Property on fetchEvent to indicate the target client (#874) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Remove frameType, maybe add ancestorOrigins (#732) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only-if-cached (#159) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add 'parser metadata' to requests. (#285) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add 'parser metadata' to requests. (#285) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Stop after setting an url’s query to null. (#114) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] `url.port = ""` sets the port number to null. (#113) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Stop after setting an url’s query to null. (#114) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] `url.port = ""` sets the port number to null. (#113) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] `url.port = ""` sets the port number to null. (#113) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication (#282) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Body's total bytes for HEAD requests (#284) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Change "validate the response" to "process the response" to match HTML (#876) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Define encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication (#282) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Export the algorithms intended for use by other specs. (#43) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Export the algorithms intended for use by other specs. (#43) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Credentials flag text in "CORS-preflight fetch" is unnecessarily convoluted (#279) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] should fetch() allow no-cors cross-origin HEAD request? (#278) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use `,` rather than `, ` for combine operation (#207) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Swap `prefix, localName` params of create an element (#214) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Swap `prefix, localName` params of create an element (#214) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Sunday, 10 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Rename simple header (#277) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Sunday, 10 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Write a formatting guide (#276) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] How does request url differ from url list and current url? (#275) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] How does request url differ from url list and current url? (#275) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Inconsistency when using "Rethrow any exceptions" (#209) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Friday, 8 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Friday, 8 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Unify behavior for error handling in supports() and contains() methods (#202) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Unify behavior for error handling in supports() and contains() methods (#202) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add support for custom elements (7f63535) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add support for custom elements (7f63535) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Unify behavior for error handling in supports() and contains() methods (#202) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Align with origin changes in HTML (20b3f3e) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Use “service worker” consistently (#818) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Use “service worker” consistently (#818) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Use “service worker” consistently (#818) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] What's proper SW name? :) (#705) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Align with origin changes in HTML (20b3f3e) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to configure default Headers (#271) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "Attr? setAttributeNode(Attr attr);" (#205) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] utf-8 encoder lead byte switch branches 0xE0 to 0xEF, 0xF0 to 0xF4 need 'return continue' (#42) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Adding BRF as "legacy" single-byte encoding for braille (#40) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Adding BRF as "legacy" single-byte encoding for braille (#40) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Adding BRF as "legacy" single-byte encoding for braille (#40) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept headers in spec cause confusion (#274) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Make the name of ISO-8859-8-I all upper case in encodings.json. (#41) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Make the name of ISO-8859-8-I all upper case in encodings.json. (#41) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Avoid teaching bad UTF-8 math. (#38) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Adding BRF as "legacy" single-byte encoding for braille (#40) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Adding .closest() to more nodes (#161) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Should we match the ES spelling of "unscopable" (#103) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "HTMLCollection is an historical artifact we can..." (#203) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "HTMLCollection is an historical artifact we can..." (#203) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename getAssignedNodes()? (#451) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "HTMLCollection is an historical artifact we can..." (#203) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Element.prototype.closest(selectors) (fd69cc7) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Reminder to update document's origin definition after HTML updates (#195) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Simply return the port for a URL's origin, not its default port (#102) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Issue #269: Add 'cryptographic nonce metadata' to requests. (#273) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to configure default Headers (#271) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 4 April)
- [whatwg/streams] Mention code of conduct in README (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Blob URLs should grab HTTPS state from Blob objects (#270) (Monday, 4 April)
- [w3c/FileAPI] Store HTTPS state on Blob objects (#35) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Wording around default actions needs updating (#14) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Validating and escaping mismatch in pathname (#112) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] IDNA / UTS #46 "should" requirements (#110) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defineElement should not cache lifecycle callbacks and prototype of a custom element class (#417) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] IDNA / UTS #46 "should" requirements (#110) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] File names in application/x-www-form-urlencoded serializer (#109) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] File names in application/x-www-form-urlencoded serializer (#109) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove feature detection from add() and add supports() (#123) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider simpler alternative to the "type extension elements" (#478) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Parse <slot> like <template> (#59) (Saturday, 2 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] "// close() method inherited from WorkerGlobalScope should not be accessible." (#865) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow caches to opt-in to granular cleanup (#863) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow caches to opt-in to granular cleanup (#863) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow caches to opt-in to granular cleanup (#863) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Storage persistence (#85) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] "syncable" storage? (#1) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Allow all storage types to expire, not just cookies (#11) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Rename requestPersistent() to persist() (#17) (Friday, 1 April)
- [whatwg/storage] Permissions API integration needs to be improved (#19) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Permissions API reflection for Persistent Permission (#14) (Friday, 1 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Review of jyasskin's draft (#74) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add additional legacy encodings (#39) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add additional legacy encodings (#39) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename getAssignedNodes()? (#451) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
Anssi Kostiainen
Anthony Jones
ArkadiuszMichalski
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: add <code> back to the Events section (28689ed) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "event . cancelable Returns true or false depend..." (#226) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "convert nodes into a node" needs to specify which document is used as the owner document for the nodes it creates (#224) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Saturday, 9 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Default value for node document or always set it explicitly (#212) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Friday, 8 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Inconsistency when using "Rethrow any exceptions" (#209) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add support for custom elements (7f63535) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Align with origin changes in HTML (20b3f3e) (Thursday, 7 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Made more formal for object global (#206) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "Attr? setAttributeNode(Attr attr);" (#205) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Align with origin changes in HTML (20b3f3e) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "Attr? setAttributeNode(Attr attr);" (#205) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Element.prototype.closest(selectors) (fd69cc7) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add Element.prototype.closest(selectors) (fd69cc7) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Drop "keyevents" as an alias of "keyboardevent" for createEvent (#148) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove feature detection from add() and add supports() (#123) (Saturday, 2 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Unify behavior for error handling in supports() and contains() methods (#202) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove feature detection from add() and add supports() (#123) (Saturday, 2 April)
Arron Eicholz
Arthur Stolyar
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add client "close" event (#868) (Friday, 8 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Saturday, 2 April)
Artyom Egorov
Aryeh Gregor
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] SVGEvent is only Gecko, Blink also has SVGEvents (#228) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Add more legacy event types for createEvent() (#220) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Having getElementsByTagName match on localName is not "web"-compatible for IE and Firefox (#143) (Sunday, 10 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Sunday, 10 April)
Ashley (Scirra)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add a way to detect reloading only client (#872) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add cache.name property (#869) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add cache.name property (#869) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add client "close" event (#868) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
Ayke
Bart Nagel
Ben Francis
Ben Kelly
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] clarify secure context requirements in Handle Fetch (#890) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Monday, 25 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] clarify that Clients.matchAll() only returns Window Client objects with active documents (#888) (Friday, 22 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec exactly how to order non-window Client objects (#887) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Relationship between streams tests in whatwg/streams repo and W3C/web-platform-tests repo (#440) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider firing a "clientcontrolled" event on ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#886) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] be more explicit that jobs always run asynchronously (#861) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Saturday, 16 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should EventSource bypass service worker interception? (#885) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should be more explicit about accessing internal body on opaque Responses (#710) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should be more explicit about accessing internal body on opaque Responses (#710) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should be more explicit about accessing internal body on opaque Responses (#710) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] addAll should resolve when the cache is fully & successfully written (#884) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Where are ServiceWorker data stored? (#883) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker lifetime and respondWith() with a user-constructed ReadableStream (#882) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Where are ServiceWorker data stored? (#883) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Where are ServiceWorker data stored? (#883) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker lifetime and respondWith() with a user-constructed ReadableStream (#882) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] serviceworker for iframes with srcdoc (#765) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] navigations that are not intercepted should still allow interception on further redirects (#793) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] "Wait for all the tasks queued by Update State" language is problematic (#848) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] be more explicit that jobs always run asynchronously (#861) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request.cache reflect non-fetch browser cache controls? (#875) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] navigations that are not intercepted should still allow interception on further redirects (#793) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request.cache reflect non-fetch browser cache controls? (#875) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Monday, 11 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] should fetch() allow no-cors cross-origin HEAD request? (#278) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make the Cache API deal with request's redirect mode not being "follow" (#737) (Monday, 11 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request.cache reflect non-fetch browser cache controls? (#875) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] CSP Request Header and CORS preflight fetch. (#52) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] How does request url differ from url list and current url? (#275) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] How does request url differ from url list and current url? (#275) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Race when registering multiple service workers for the same scope (#783) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add cache.name property (#869) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add cache.name property (#869) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add client "close" event (#868) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add cache.name property (#869) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow caches to opt-in to granular cleanup (#863) (Friday, 1 April)
Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler
bifurcation
Binyamin Laukstein
Boris Zbarsky
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Monday, 25 April)
- [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> (#6) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Should send() throw if the XHR object's window's document is not fully active? (#65) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [whatwg/xhr] Should send() throw if the XHR object's window's document is not fully active? (#65) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Stop storing the global object on XMLHttpRequest twice (#64) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] "convert nodes into a node" needs to specify which document is used as the owner document for the nodes it creates (#224) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Should specify that all JS functions created by IDL are "built-in functions" (#106) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Should specify that all JS functions created by IDL are "built-in functions" (#106) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Monday, 4 April)
Brett Zamir
Brian Birtles
Brian Kardell
Bryan Nicholls
Calvin Metcalf
Cameron McCormack
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove support for [Constructor] on dctionaries (fixes #109). (#111) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Reorganize IDs for the common definitions. (#112) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove support for [Constructor] on dctionaries (fixes #109). (#111) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove support for [Constructor] on dctionaries (fixes #109). (#111) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove support for [Constructor] on dctionaries (fixes #109). (#111) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove support for [Constructor] on dctionaries (fixes #109). (#111) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove support for [Constructor] on dctionaries (fixes #109). (#111) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Bikeshed-link fixes (#110) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Bikeshed-link fixes (#110) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Link the common typedefs, and fix FrozenArray's lt attribute. (#108) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Link the common typedefs, and fix FrozenArray's lt attribute. (#108) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove dictionary constructors (#109) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Should we match the ES spelling of "unscopable" (#103) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/103 by aligning the spelling of [Unscopable] with ES6. (#104) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Make all the WebIDL dfns Bikeshed-friendly (#105) (Tuesday, 5 April)
chaals
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: "are" custom element names ASCII characters, or MUST they be ASCII characters? (#239) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/push-api] Allow Subscription via TOPIC headers (#189) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 11-12aprSW.md (#33) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 11-12aprSW.md (#32) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Filling out agenda (#30) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Add myself to attendees. (#29) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Add Ben Kelly to attendees. (#23) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Add referrer policy issue (#26) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Simplify text for introduction course (#14) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Consistent date formatting for F2F meetings (#15) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] I'll be at the upcoming SW F2F. (#22) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] I'll be at the upcoming SW F2F. (#22) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Add Ben Kelly to attendees. (#23) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Clean up attendee list (#28) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Large custom element spec rewrite to implement some F2F decisions (d95392f) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Sunday, 3 April)
Chong Zhang
- [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Rename "replaceContent" with "insertContent" or "insertNonText" (#126) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Monday, 18 April)
- [w3c/editing] beforeinput: cE shouldn't fire `beforeinput` for caret movement (#123) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput: Should we fire `replaceContent` during IME composition? (#122) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput: Should we fire `replaceContent` during IME composition? (#122) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [w3c/editing] beforeinput: Should we fire `replaceContent` during IME composition? (#122) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [w3c/uievents] Mismatch definition for `beforeinput` with `w3c/editing` (#85) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Rename "inputCharacter" to "inputText" (#119) (Thursday, 7 April)
- [w3c/editing] Replace 'insertCharacter' with 'insertText' (#120) (Thursday, 7 April)
Chris Dumez
Chris Rebert
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event.returnValue legacy property (#222) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event.returnValue legacy property (#222) (Friday, 15 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Event.returnValue legacy property (#222) (Friday, 15 April)
- [w3c/uievents-key] Add link to "UI Events code" in README (#24) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Set GitHub website field (#80) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Friday, 8 April)
- [w3c/uievents] MouseEvent.fromElement/toElement (#84) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- [w3c/uievents] Add self to ACKS (#83) (Saturday, 2 April)
cynthia
Cyril Auburtin
Cyril Concolato
Daniel Levy
Daniel Lo Nigro
Daniel Murphy
Dave Methvin
Dave Tapuska
David Håsäther
ddorwin
Dimitri Glazkov
Domenic Denicola
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Mostly-editorial tweaks to align with newer ES algorithm styles (#444) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Mostly-editorial tweaks to align with newer ES algorithm styles (#444) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- [whatwg/streams] Update reference implementation for Node v6 (#445) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- [whatwg/streams] Mostly-editorial tweaks to align with newer ES algorithm styles (#444) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] node streams coordination (#435) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] node streams coordination (#435) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] doc: Fix some variable, properties and function references. (#442) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] doc: Fix some variable, properties and function references. (#442) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Relationship between streams tests in whatwg/streams repo and W3C/web-platform-tests repo (#440) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Target for web-platform-tests streams API tests (#411) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] doc: Fix some variable, properties and function references. (#442) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) (Friday, 22 April)
- [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Relationship between streams tests in whatwg/streams repo and W3C/web-platform-tests repo (#440) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Relationship between streams tests in whatwg/streams repo and W3C/web-platform-tests repo (#440) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Fixing 'ReadableStream: should call pull when trying to read from a started, empty stream' flakiness (#441) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Guideline] Style (#421) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Contributing.md with various editing guidelines (#439) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Guideline] Where to factor out logic (#437) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] annotations to mutating methods (#235) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [w3c/selection-api] Add [CEReactions] to Selection's deleteFromDocument() (#68) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Add [CEReactions] annotations (#5) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Add [CEReactions] annotations (#5) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] annotations to mutating methods (#235) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Relationship between streams tests in whatwg/streams repo and W3C/web-platform-tests repo (#440) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add authoring guidance for writing custom element constructors (#409) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Return constructor from customElements.define (#484) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Return constructor from customElements.define (#484) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Updates to element creation and cross-references (#231) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Updates to element creation and cross-references (#231) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Updates to element creation and cross-references (#231) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/streams] Add Contributing.md with various editing guidelines (#439) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Guideline] Where to factor out logic (#437) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Allow to set mime-type when calling blob() on a stream (#438) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Allow to set mime-type when calling blob() on a stream (#438) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] URLUtils is wrong for Location object (#61) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/url] URLUtils is wrong for Location object (#61) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Guideline] Where to factor out logic (#437) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define attachShadow() for custom elements (#223) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event.returnValue legacy property (#222) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Should specify that all JS functions created by IDL are "built-in functions" (#106) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker lifetime and respondWith() with a user-constructed ReadableStream (#882) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Export the algorithms intended for use by other specs. (#43) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Event delegation via EventListenerOptions (#215) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Change "validate the response" to "process the response" to match HTML (#876) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Swap `prefix, localName` params of create an element (#214) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Mention code of conduct in README (#434) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Merge getBYOBReader() into getReader() and rename class names and switches (#436) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Merge getBYOBReader() into getReader() and rename class names and switches (#436) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "The previousElementSibling and nextElementSibli..." (#210) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Revert "Revert edits to custom elements made by me for process reasons" (9d349ee) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add support for custom elements (7f63535) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add support for custom elements (7f63535) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Thursday, 7 April)
- [heycam/webidl] Should specify that all JS functions created by IDL are "built-in functions" (#106) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Large custom element spec rewrite to implement some F2F decisions (d95392f) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Large custom element spec rewrite to implement some F2F decisions (d95392f) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defineElement should not cache lifecycle callbacks and prototype of a custom element class (#417) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defineElement should not cache lifecycle callbacks and prototype of a custom element class (#417) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Parse <slot> like <template> (#59) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Parse <slot> like <template> (#59) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider exposing Shadom DOM and Custom Elements only in secure contexts (#449) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider exposing Shadom DOM and Custom Elements only in secure contexts (#449) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should shadow host have `display: block` by default? (#426) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to configure default Headers (#271) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What DOM content category do custom elements belong to? (#454) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What DOM content category do custom elements belong to? (#454) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Note about "custom" is misleading (#461) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Note about "custom" is misleading (#461) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Editorial: create an element's "new element" step (#463) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Create an element type extension path with sync flag set should not enqueue upgrade; it should just upgrade (#469) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] createElement and createElementNS() should check is attribute (#466) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] createElement and createElementNS() should check is attribute (#466) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Element interfaces (#472) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Element interfaces (#472) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider simpler alternative to the "type extension elements" (#478) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider simpler alternative to the "type extension elements" (#478) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Parse <slot> like <template> (#59) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defineElement should not cache lifecycle callbacks and prototype of a custom element class (#417) (Friday, 1 April)
Dominic Cooney
duyenzuny
Dylan Barrell
Ed S
Ehsan Akhgari
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only-if-cached (#159) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only-if-cached (#159) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request.cache reflect non-fetch browser cache controls? (#875) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Monday, 11 April)
Elliott Sprehn
Emily Stark
Erik Wilde
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Thursday, 14 April)
felt
Frederik
Gary Kacmarcik
- [w3c/uievents] Editorial cleanup to prep for next WD (#86) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Set GitHub website field (#80) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-key] Add link to "UI Events code" in README (#24) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-key] Add link to "UI Events code" in README (#24) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Set GitHub website field (#80) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Set GitHub website field (#80) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-key] Mention modern usage of Esc (#23) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-key] "ISO Level 3 shift modifier" is unclear (#18) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Gamepad-specific DOM keys / location? (#79) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Gamepad-specific DOM keys / location? (#79) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-code] 'IntlHash' should be dropped from the spec (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Add self to ACKS (#83) (Sunday, 3 April)
Giovanni Ortuno
gked
Gruber Julian
Hallvord R. M. Steen
- [w3c/clipboard-apis] Discoverability of custom type support (#30) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How should focus be managed? (#26) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Create an easier to use API (#12) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Should queryCommandEnabled(cut|copy|paste) trigger onbefore* events? (#4) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Should queryCommandEnabled(cut|copy|paste) trigger onbefore* events? (#4) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Wording around default actions needs updating (#14) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clarify some things regarding onbefore* events (#15) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clarify some things regarding onbefore* events (#15) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] unsuccessful paste actions should return false (#17) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Be explicit about before* events (#24) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Be explicit about before* events (#24) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Kill onbeforecopy, onbeforecut and onbeforepaste events (#25) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Remove links to Bugzilla (#28) (Sunday, 3 April)
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Separate "request access" from "request permission"? (#94) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Don't assume implicit grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Don't assume implicit grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Thursday, 14 April)
Hayato Ito
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped need changes (#486) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define event retargeting for shadow trees (#240) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped need changes (#486) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped need changes (#486) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define the timing when distribution happens (#73) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define the timing when distribution happens (#73) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: define slotchange event (#229) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] An API for determining if the focused element is a text editor (#483) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should shadow host have `display: block` by default? (#426) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should shadow host have `display: block` by default? (#426) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Introduce "delegatesFocus" flag to shadow root (#126) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make Slot.assingedNodes({flatten: true}) return an empty array if the slot is in a document tree (#482) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make Slot.assingedNodes({flatten: true}) return an empty array if the slot is in a document tree (#482) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make Slot.assingedNodes({flatten: true}) return null if the slot is in a document tree (#482) (Friday, 8 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Make Slot.assingedNodes({flatten: true}) return null if the slot is in a document tree (#482) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Where is the spec? (#481) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus to the spec (#455) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] CSSOM: ignore title attributes on style elements in shadow trees (#391) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus to the spec (#455) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Proposed change for active element algorithm. (#380) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM Cascade Order (#316) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Focus Navigation for slots (#375) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename getAssignedNodes()? (#451) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Slots in a flat tree (#308) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Adding .closest() to more nodes (#161) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename getAssignedNodes()? (#451) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename getAssignedNodes()? (#451) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] {DocumentOrShadowRoot or Slot}.activePath (#479) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow] activeElement behavior seems to break encapsulation (#358) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] deepPath's definition is ambiguous when the event path contains a non-Node EventTarget (#432) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] deepPath's definition is ambiguous when the event path contains a non-Node EventTarget (#432) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Closed flag proposal breaks ability to audit and automate tests of web pages (#354) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should shadow host have `display: block` by default? (#426) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename getAssignedNodes()? (#451) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Friday, 1 April)
Henri Sivonen
hiroshige-g
hmottestad
Ilya Grigorik
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Performance Observer Review (formerly Navigation Timing 2 concepts) (#18) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 1 April)
ironfroggy
Jake Archibald
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove about:unicorn (#147) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] OpaqueResponse object (#258) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should the cache control default mode match how the page is loaded? (#289) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 15 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] addAll should resolve when the cache is fully & successfully written (#884) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Move service worker spec into w3c (#881) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Move service worker spec into w3c (#881) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Move service worker spec into w3c (#881) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Move service worker spec and cache api spec onto w3c (#881) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Split the cache API into its own spec (#879) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Split the cache API into its own spec (#879) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Split the cache API into its own spec (#879) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 11-12aprSW.md (#33) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] navigations that are not intercepted should still allow interception on further redirects (#793) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] navigations that are not intercepted should still allow interception on further redirects (#793) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request.cache reflect non-fetch browser cache controls? (#875) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] if service-worker-allowed header changes should active worker be potentially unregistered? (#857) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] if service-worker-allowed header changes should active worker be potentially unregistered? (#857) (Monday, 11 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Reporting URL for SW update failures (#877) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Restrict openWindow() to http(s) schemes? (#699) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should be more explicit about accessing internal body on opaque Responses (#710) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Remove frameType, maybe add ancestorOrigins (#732) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer.controller prose says to return undefined, but the IDL doesn't allow that (#769) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] passthrough service worker can break sites using redirected stylesheets (#757) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Monday, 11 April)
- [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 11-12aprSW.md (#32) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] "Wait for all the tasks queued by Update State" language is problematic (#848) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] be more explicit that jobs always run asynchronously (#861) (Monday, 11 April)
- [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 11-12aprSW.md (#31) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Implement API to reject PUSH_PROMISEs sent by the server over HTTP/2 (#796) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Implement API to reject PUSH_PROMISEs sent by the server over HTTP/2 (#796) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP/2 server push support (#51) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Promise on navigator.serviceWorker that resolves when page is controlled (#799) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Promise on navigator.serviceWorker that resolves when page is controlled (#799) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Can create caches in the persistent storage? (#803) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Can create caches in the persistent storage? (#803) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Save initial files into cache storage instead of browser's cache (#820) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Browser Cache and ServiceWorker (#824) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Browser Cache and ServiceWorker (#824) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Take into accounts etags on initialization importScripts responses to update the Service Worker (#830) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Take into accounts etags on initialization importScripts responses to update the Service Worker (#830) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Consider relying on eTags (or other headers) for service worker dependencies to check for updates (#839) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Sunday, 10 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Property on fetchEvent to indicate the target client (#874) (Sunday, 10 April)
- [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Filling out agenda (#30) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add a way to detect reloading only client (#872) (Sunday, 10 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Drop isReload (#873) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Entries movement between caches (#871) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] client (#864) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Is a new property to get the navigation's target client needed? (#817) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add client "close" event (#868) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide a convenience method to run code outside event handler (#866) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service Worker Error (#858) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service Worker Error (#858) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] if service-worker-allowed header changes should active worker be potentially unregistered? (#857) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Cache transactions & fixing `addAll` (#823) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Allow all storage types to expire, not just cookies (#11) (Friday, 1 April)
Jan Miksovsky
jan-ivar
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Permission API has terminology issues one could drive a truck through. (#85) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Permission API has terminology issues one could drive a truck through. (#85) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Replace "Permission" with "Persistent Permission" globally. (#85) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Permission absent context == persistent permission (#85) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] navigator.permissions.request (#48) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] navigator.permissions.request (#48) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] navigator.permissions.request (#48) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Don't assume implicit grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove the incorrect paragraph about request() and revoke() having been removed from the spec. (#79) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove the incorrect paragraph about request() and revoke() having been removed from the spec. (#79) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Don't assume collateral grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
janvarga
Jarek Foksa
Jeff Burtoft
Jeff Carpenter
Jeffrey Yasskin
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Friday, 29 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Switch to having TravisCI build the spec (#89) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Why is "retrieve the permission storage" not in "Permission store"? (#84) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define underlying infrastructure (#33) (Monday, 25 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Sunday, 24 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Specify how request and revoke work on push and midi permissions. (#90) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Permission API has terminology issues one could drive a truck through. (#85) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define underlying infrastructure (#33) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Permission API has terminology issues one could drive a truck through. (#85) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Permissions API integration needs to be improved (#19) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Add the "bluetooth" permission, linked to [web-bluetooth]. (#88) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Switch to having TravisCI build the spec (#89) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Add the "bluetooth" permission, linked to [web-bluetooth]. (#88) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Model temporary permissions better (#86) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Permission absent context == persistent permission (#85) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename PermissionStatus to PermissionResult. (#82) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename PermissionStatus to PermissionResult. (#82) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Monday, 18 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Rename PermissionStatus to PermissionResult. (#82) (Sunday, 17 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Rename the "associated PermissionDescriptor" to the "permission descriptor type". (#81) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Export dfn-type definitions that other specs should be able to use. (#80) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove the incorrect paragraph about request() and revoke() having been removed from the spec. (#79) (Friday, 15 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Export dfn-type definitions that other specs should be able to use. (#80) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Don't assume implicit grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove the incorrect paragraph about request() and revoke() having been removed from the spec. (#79) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Remove the incorrect paragraph about request() and revoke() having been removed from the spec. (#79) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Don't assume implicit grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] request/revoke (#46) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Add permissions.request() (#41) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Add permissions.request() (#41) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [heycam/webidl] Link the common typedefs, and fix FrozenArray's lt attribute. (#108) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Export the algorithms intended for use by other specs. (#43) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [whatwg/encoding] Export the algorithms intended for use by other specs. (#43) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Convert to Bikeshed (#75) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Convert to Bikeshed (#75) (Saturday, 9 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Convert to Bikeshed (#75) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Let each permission refine its algorithms and store data. (#66) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Define a PermissionStorage type for each permission to store data with. (#73) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Review of jyasskin's draft (#74) (Friday, 1 April)
jeisinger
Jesse McCarthy
Jesse Tane
Jimmy Karl Roland Wärting
Joel Weinberger
Johannes Wilm
- Re: [w3c/editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] The Ranges type is not defined, should be FrozenArray<Range>? (#113) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Rename "replaceContent" with "insertContent" or "insertNonText" (#126) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] The Ranges type is not defined, should be FrozenArray<Range>? (#113) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Rename "replaceContent" with "insertContent" or "insertNonText" (#126) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Word deletion (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput: cE shouldn't fire `beforeinput` for caret movement (#123) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] [Input Events] Why are insertText and replaceContent separate events? (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput: Should we fire `replaceContent` during IME composition? (#122) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput: Should we fire `replaceContent` during IME composition? (#122) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Insert image in link (#121) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Insert image in link (#121) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Avoiding nesting like pre > p or p > h2 that works but aren't valid in html (#115) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Avoiding nesting like pre > p or p > h2 that works but aren't valid in html (#115) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Avoiding nesting like pre > p or p > h2 that works but aren't valid in html (#115) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Avoiding nesting like pre > p or p > h2 that works but aren't valid in html (#115) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] execCommand('underline') on links (#114) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] execCommand('underline') on links (#114) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Avoiding nesting like pre > p or p > h2 that works but aren't valid in html (#115) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Unify "deleteContent" and "deleteComposedCharacter" (#118) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] Replace 'insertCharacter' with 'insertText' (#120) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Rename "inputCharacter" to "inputText" (#119) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/editing] beforeInput: Rename "inputCharacter" to "inputText" (#119) (Friday, 8 April)
Jonas Sicking
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] deleteDatabase error case should never happen (#74) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Monday, 4 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] "syncable" storage? (#1) (Friday, 1 April)
Jonathan Clem
Jonathan Watt
Joseph Orbegoso Pea
- [w3c/webcomponents] Why allow shadow root style to access :host? (#490) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Sharing styles across custom elements (#282) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should shadow host have `display: block` by default? (#426) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Saturday, 23 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: "are" custom element names ASCII characters, or MUST they be ASCII characters? (#239) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: "are" custom element names ASCII characters, or MUST they be ASCII characters? (#239) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ES5 consideration for custom elements (#423) (Monday, 11 April)
Josh Matthews
Joshua Bell
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Key Paths: Support iteration step operator (#35) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Key Paths: Support iteration step operator (#35) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/FileAPI] Re-add FileReader.readAsBinaryString() ? (#39) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [whatwg/storage] Rework definitions in "Quota" section / API steps for estimate (#22) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [whatwg/storage] Default box type: change from "atomic" to... ? (#21) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [whatwg/storage] Add example for estimate() (#20) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Shared databases and stores (and more robust schemas) (#75) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Shared databases and stores (and more robust schemas) (#75) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [w3c/FileAPI] Use BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer or ArrayBufferView (#38) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Fix regression in utf-8 decoder (#45) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Consider removing TextEncoder support for UTF-16 (#18) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Add FileAPI reference (#70) (Monday, 18 April)
- [w3c/IndexedDB] deleteDatabase error case should never happen (#74) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] utf-8 decoder lead byte switch branches 0xE0 to 0xEF, 0xF0 to 0xF4 need 'return continue' (#42) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] utf-8 encoder lead byte switch branches 0xE0 to 0xEF, 0xF0 to 0xF4 need 'return continue' (#42) (Thursday, 7 April)
- [whatwg/encoding] utf-8 encoder lead byte switch branches 0xE0 to 0xEF, 0xF0 to 0xF4 need 'return continue' (#42) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add additional legacy encodings (#39) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add additional legacy encodings (#39) (Saturday, 2 April)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add additional legacy encodings (#39) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] "syncable" storage? (#1) (Friday, 1 April)
- [whatwg/encoding] Add additional legacy encodings (#39) (Friday, 1 April)
Joshua Peek
jsen-
Julien Wajsberg
Jungkee Song
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] "// close() method inherited from WorkerGlobalScope should not be accessible." (#865) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer.controller prose says to return undefined, but the IDL doesn't allow that (#769) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer.controller prose says to return undefined, but the IDL doesn't allow that (#769) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make secure context requirements more explicit (#754) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] spec should queue tasks to expose attribute changes on ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration (#860) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] "Wait for all the tasks queued by Update State" language is problematic (#848) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] be more explicit that jobs always run asynchronously (#861) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] be more explicit that jobs always run asynchronously (#861) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Make the Blob URL creating/revoking methods not be exposed on the ser… (#31) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Promise type on an attribute should be allowed (#71) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] MessagePort[] no longer valid in WebIDL (#810) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] should update() during top level script evaluation be ignored? (#800) (Friday, 1 April)
Justin Fagnani
Jörn Zaefferer
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(updates): remove text about updates (closes #384) (#457) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest "sizes" fallback logic (#409) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description member (#435) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(manifest): add description member (closes #435) (#456) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(manifest): add description member (closes #435) (#456) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Add worker modules (6d9500e) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional indication of Service Workers to Manifest (#447) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
Kirill Dmitrenko
Koji Ishii
Kornel
Lewis Phạm
littledan
Lucas Garron
luxlux
Léonie Watson
Majid Valipour
Maksim Chemerisuk
malibuzios
Manu Sporny
Marc G.
Marcos Caceres
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support for deep integrations, e.g. OpenSearch (#421) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] SVG icon sizes="any" (or without property "sizes") (#407) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] SVG icon sizes="any" (or without property "sizes") (#407) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicilty (#446) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Feat(density): remove density member (closes #450) (#451) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional indication of Service Workers to Manifest (#447) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional indication of Service Workers to Manifest (#447) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Monday, 11 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Convert to Bikeshed (#75) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicilty (#446) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicilty (#446) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Privacy Review: how to handle navigation to a fullscreen'd application? (#402) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way for an app to be installed explicitly? (#446) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix #9: Remove splash_screens from example (too) (#445) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow developers to detect when the user has added the site to their home screen (or equivalent) (#417) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Feat(displaymodes): add priv/sec note (closes #402) (#444) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add description field to Manifest (#435) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat (splashscreens): remove splash screen from spec (closes #9) (#440) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Privacy (#441) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Privacy Review: mention that users should vouch for sensitive information (#401) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Privacy Review: cross origin persistent state (#400) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Privacy Review: handle start_url tracking (#399) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Privacy (#441) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Poorly coded example on w3c (#437) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix (introduction): example math was wrong (closes #437) (#438) (Monday, 4 April)
Marcos Cáceres
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Support a way to update explicitly (#446) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Updating is under/incorrectly specified (#384) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(updates): remove text about updates (closes #384) (#457) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(updates): remove text about updates (closes #384) (#457) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify how image objects should be fetched (#443) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(updates): remove text about updates (closes #384) (#457) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(updates): remove text about updates (closes #384) (#457) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] SVG icon sizes="any" (or without property "sizes") (#407) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] SVG icon sizes="any" (or without property "sizes") (#407) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest "sizes" fallback logic (#409) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Manifest "sizes" fallback logic (#409) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] The curious (special) case of orientation (#463) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Fix(orientation): return undefined (closes #463) (#464) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/manifest] The curious (special) case of orientation (#463) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow for multiple scopes (#449) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify how image objects should be fetched (#443) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Case sensitivity of enumerated values (#460) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Fix(processing): treat enums as case insensitive (#462) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Review of the installation event feature (#453) (#461) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Review of the installation event feature (#453) (#461) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Review of the installation event feature (#453) (#461) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Case sensitivity of enumerated values (#460) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Case sensitivity of enumerated values (#460) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify how image objects should be fetched (#443) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Feat(image objects): clarify how to fetch (closes #443) (#459) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Clarify how image objects should be fetched (#443) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Chore(extensions): add link to registry (closes #452) (#458) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Fix(updates): remove text about updates (closes #384) (#457) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(manifest): add description member (closes #435) (#456) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Feat(manifest): add description member (closes #435) (#456) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add install event (#455) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(installation): installation definition and event (#453) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(installation): installation definition and event (#453) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(installation): installation definition and event (#453) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [w3c/manifest] Add install event (#455) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add install and beforeinstallprompt events (#417) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Ability to detect if the current document is part of an "installed" web app (#454) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Monday, 18 April)
- [w3c/manifest] WIP: Rough draft of installation stuff (#453) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add install and beforeinstallprompt events (#417) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove the incorrect paragraph about request() and revoke() having been removed from the spec. (#79) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Export dfn-type definitions that other specs should be able to use. (#80) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] i18n: No direction metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-416] (#334) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add install and beforeinstallprompt events (#417) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(density): remove density member (closes #450) (#451) (Thursday, 14 April)
Marijn Kruisselbrink
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] clarify secure context requirements in Handle Fetch (#890) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) (Friday, 22 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Consider using USVString for the Blob constructor (#30) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clean up use of WebIDL for Exposed=(Window, Worker) (#21) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] FilePropertyBag should inherit from BlobPropertyBag (#22) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Use `optional` for the Blob constructor (#33) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] fixed syntax in example (#36) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Make the Blob URL creating/revoking methods not be exposed on the ser… (#31) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Reporting URL for SW update failures (#877) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Monday, 11 April)
- [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Add myself to attendees. (#29) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Define some way for foreign fetch to decide on opaqueness of responses (#841) (Monday, 4 April)
Mark Nottingham
- [w3ctag/spec-reviews] URNbis documents (#117) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] should fetch() allow no-cors cross-origin HEAD request? (#278) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication (#282) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication (#282) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] "There is a cache match for request if origin is..." (#281) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use `,` rather than `, ` for combine operation (#207) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept headers in spec cause confusion (#274) (Wednesday, 6 April)
Martin Thomson
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Install algorithm step 14 should clear waiting worker before updating state to redundant (#851) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP/2 server push support (#51) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/push-api] Allow Subscription via TOPIC headers (#189) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/push-api] Allow Subscription via TOPIC headers (#189) (Friday, 8 April)
Mathias Bynens
Matt Falkenhagen
Matt Giuca
Matt N.
michael-nordman
Michael[tm] Smith
Michał Gołębiowski
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Future for unique tokens in DOMTokenList (#201) (Wednesday, 6 April)
Michiel Bijl
Mihai Potra
Mike West
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Friday, 15 April)
- [whatwg/xhr] Add a <dfn> for FormData's entry's type. (#63) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add 'parser metadata' to requests. (#285) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add 'parser metadata' to requests. (#285) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Add 'parser metadata' to requests. (#285) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Issue #269: Add 'cryptographic nonce metadata' to requests. (#273) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Store HTTPS state on Blob objects (#35) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 4 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] The CSP hooks for `<script src='...' nonce='...'>` are broken. (#269) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow setting `cookie` header in credential-less CORS requests (#268) (Monday, 4 April)
Miriam Torres
Mounir Lamouri
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permission shouldn't imply storing it. (#93) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Switch to having TravisCI build the spec (#89) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Switch to having TravisCI build the spec (#89) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Requesting permissions needs to be able to ask for multiple things (#92) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Switch to having TravisCI build the spec (#89) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Retitle the Permissions spec to emphasize the infrastructure more. (#87) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(orientation): return undefined (closes #463) (#464) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] The curious (special) case of orientation (#463) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(orientation): return undefined (closes #463) (#464) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(processing): treat enums as case insensitive (#462) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Case sensitivity of enumerated values (#460) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(processing): treat enums as case insensitive (#462) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename the "associated PermissionDescriptor" to the "permission descriptor type". (#81) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename the "associated PermissionDescriptor" to the "permission descriptor type". (#81) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Case sensitivity of enumerated values (#460) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename PermissionStatus to PermissionResult. (#82) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename PermissionStatus to PermissionResult. (#82) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename PermissionStatus to PermissionResult. (#82) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] i18n: No direction metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-416] (#334) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Don't assume implicit grant from getUserMedia. (#78) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(density): remove density member (closes #450) (#451) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Feat(density): remove density member (closes #450) (#451) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Support minimizable request UI with permissions.request() (#76) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Convert to Bikeshed (#75) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Convert to Bikeshed (#75) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Run Tidy and fix ReSpec errors. (#69) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Run Tidy and fix ReSpec errors. (#69) (Monday, 4 April)
Ms2ger
NARUSE, Yui
Nazar Mokrynskyi
Nick Doty
Nickolay Ponomarev
Noah Freitas
Nolan Lawson
ojan
Oleg Slobodskoi
overholt
Patrick H. Lauke
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Friday, 22 April)
- [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the order of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] explicitly define what happens with Touch Events during scrolling, pinch-zoom, etc? (#60) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] explicitly define what happens with Touch Events during scrolling, pinch-zoom, etc? (#60) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] explicitly define what happens with Touch Events during scrolling, pinch-zoom, etc? (#60) (Saturday, 16 April)
- [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse events/click note to specify these are usually only fired for tap (#63) (Saturday, 16 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] explicitly define what happens with Touch Events during scrolling, pinch-zoom, etc? (#60) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the order of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the order of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the order of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 3 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 3 April)
Peter Beverloo
Peter Linss
Philip Jägenstedt
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Make fullscreenElement and fullscreenEnabled [Replaceable]? (#2) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] DOMStringList has been removed from DOM (#28) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Drop the InvalidAccessError from the withCredentials setter when the synchronous flag is set (#66) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Allow synchronous withCredentials (#67) (Monday, 25 April)
- [whatwg/xhr] Drop the InvalidAccessError from the withCredentials setter when the synchronous flag is set (#66) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-merge Document and HTMLDocument (#221) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Spec for DOMTokenList stringifier disagrees with every single implementation (#105) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate Client-Hints with Fetch (#258) (Friday, 8 April)
Philippe Le Hegaret
raymeskhoury
Richard Gibson
Richard Maher
Rick Byers
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Friday, 29 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse/click interactions (#65) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-key] For user-agents on Windows OS, map the "windows key" to Meta (instead of "OS") (#9) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/uievents-key] For user-agents on Windows OS, map the "windows key" to Meta (instead of "OS") (#9) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove 'passive' from the event listener key (#236) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove 'passive' from the event listener key (#236) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Remove 'passive' from the event listener key (#236) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse events/click note to specify these are usually only fired for tap (#63) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] explicitly define what happens with Touch Events during scrolling, pinch-zoom, etc? (#60) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] explicitly define what happens with Touch Events during scrolling, pinch-zoom, etc? (#60) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider making dispatchEvent() unset stop (immediate) propagation flags (#219) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 10 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Removing event listeners through an identifier (#208) (Saturday, 9 April)
- [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Spec should be explicit on whether the order of elements in TouchLists is relevant (#13) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Why don't Touch objects have offsetX and offsetY properties like MouseEvent does? (#62) (Sunday, 3 April)
Rob Dolin (MSFT)
Rob Eisenberg
Rodney Rehm
roryhewitt
Rune Lillesveen
Ryosuke Niwa
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why allow shadow root style to access :host? (#490) (Saturday, 30 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Styling of elements where attachShadow(...) not allowed (#376) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Sunday, 24 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Does relatedTargetScoped need changes (#486) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/selection-api] Add [CEReactions] to Selection's deleteFromDocument() (#68) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ES5 consideration for custom elements (#423) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should shadow host have `display: block` by default? (#426) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make Slot.assingedNodes({flatten: true}) return null if the slot is in a document tree (#482) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream Custom Elements (#204) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Slots in a flat tree (#308) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom: use css containment features by default (#355) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defineElement should not cache lifecycle callbacks and prototype of a custom element class (#417) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Permit retrieval of registered classes from window.customElements (#445) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Need "slotchange" event (#288) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
Salvador de la Puente González
Samuel Thibault
Scott González
Scott J. Miles
scottjenson
senolv
Shawn Huang
silverwind
Simon Pieters
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix #227: Make createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw (#230) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Fix #227: Make createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw (#230) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Monday, 18 April)
- [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] SVGEvent is only Gecko, Blink also has SVGEvents (#228) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Remove "svgevent" and "touchevent" from createEvent list? (#227) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should parser extensibility be a design goal? (#113) (Sunday, 17 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Set createDocument() content type from namespace (#218) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] createDocument() should use namespace to set content type (#217) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434) (Monday, 4 April)
Simon Sapin
sleevi
smaug----
- Re: [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- [whatwg/dom] EventListenerOptions and AddEventListenerOptions should use default value false for all the properties (#239) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Saturday, 23 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Thursday, 21 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Figure out how listeners should fire AT_TARGET when doing retargeting (#237) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "The event relatedTarget retargeting process must occur prior to dispatch of an event." (#485) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Should send() throw if the XHR object's window's document is not fully active? (#65) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defined promise (#427) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] cancelBubble legacy property (#211) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Friday, 1 April)
Stefan Penner
Steve Orvell
Stuart P. Bentley
Sven Franck
Tab Atkins Jr.
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Reorganize IDs for the common definitions. (#112) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Permissions API integration needs to be improved (#19) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- [heycam/webidl] Bikeshed-link fixes (#110) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Make sure all the dfn-type definitions are exported (#233) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add term "shadow-including ancestor"? (#225) (Monday, 18 April)
- [whatwg/dom] Add term "shadow-including ancestor"? (#225) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "participate in a tree" instead of just "participate". (#216) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Saturday, 9 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Need pattern for feature detecting dictionary members (#107) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [heycam/webidl] Make all the WebIDL dfns Bikeshed-friendly (#105) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Slots in a flat tree (#308) (Friday, 1 April)
Takayoshi Kochi
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM Cascade Order (#316) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM Cascade Order (#316) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] "::slotted" pseudo elements (#331) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] An API for determining if the focused element is a text editor (#483) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Thursday, 7 April)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus in the Shadow DOM spec. (#480) (Thursday, 7 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add delegatesFocus to the spec (#455) (Wednesday, 6 April)
Takeshi Yoshino
- [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only-if-cached (#159) (Wednesday, 27 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Review request on the ReadableStream API (#433) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Review request on the ReadableStream API (#433) (Friday, 22 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Contributing.md with various editing guidelines (#439) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add Contributing.md with various editing guidelines (#439) (Thursday, 21 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Tuesday, 19 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Rename simple header (#277) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Guideline] Where to factor out logic (#437) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Review request on the ReadableStream API (#433) (Friday, 15 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only-if-cached (#159) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [whatwg/streams] Guideline for where to factor out logic (#437) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow * for Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods (#251) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker lifetime and respondWith() with a user-constructed ReadableStream (#882) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Review request on the ReadableStream API (#433) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Merge getBYOBReader() into getReader() and rename class names and switches (#436) (Monday, 11 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Mention code of conduct in README (#434) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Review request on the ReadableStream API (#433) (Friday, 8 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- [whatwg/streams] Merge getBYOBReader() into getReader() and rename class names and switches (#436) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Monday, 4 April)
tkent-google
Tobie Langel
Travis Leithead
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Provide a lightweight mechanism to add styles to a custom element (#468) (Thursday, 28 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Closed flag proposal breaks ability to audit and automate tests of web pages (#354) (Tuesday, 26 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Sort out what's happening with innerHTML on <script> and <style> in XML documents (#6) (Monday, 25 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Generic Sensor API (#110) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Add [CEReactions] annotations (#5) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Add [CEReactions] annotations (#5) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Generic Sensor API (#110) (Wednesday, 20 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.currentScript from a script in a shadow tree. (#477) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defineElement should not cache lifecycle callbacks and prototype of a custom element class (#417) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider exposing Shadom DOM and Custom Elements only in secure contexts (#449) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Define order for attributeChangedCallback invocation? (#474) (Monday, 4 April)
- Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Presentation API Request for Feedback (#61) (Friday, 1 April)
Valentin Gosu
Veli Senol
versdivers
Vignesh Shanmugam
vyv03354
Wenbo Zhu
wklm
Xander Dumaine
Xiaoqian Wu
Xidorn Quan
Yehuda Katz
Yoav Weiss
youennf
Yutaka Hirano
- [whatwg/fetch] "origin-only" and "origin" (#287) (Monday, 18 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Response construction with ReadableStream (#283) (Thursday, 14 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker lifetime and respondWith() with a user-constructed ReadableStream (#882) (Wednesday, 13 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- [whatwg/fetch] Update request's referrer policy when fetching (#280) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Tuesday, 12 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Wednesday, 6 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Tuesday, 5 April)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Referrer policy: Should request's referrer policy be updated in the main fetch? (#266) (Friday, 1 April)
Yves Lafon
Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2016 22:14:07 UTC