Re: [w3c/manifest] Possible Registry for Extension Properties (#452)

> On 15 Apr 2016, at 6:29 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> I need to think a little more about this but would like to highlight our use case as evidence for this issue.
> We've leveraged the "actions" format from the Ballista project but this may change.
> 
The ballista folks are still experimenting. It seems premature for web payments to be adding that.
> Our core requirement is for an app to advertise a set of payment methods it supports (using their string identifiers).
> 
> The proposed spec that extends Manifest is here: https://w3c.github.io/webpayments/proposals/paymentapps/payment-apps.html
> 

Whoa! Please don't do that!!! I kindly ask that you bring extensions to this forum for discussion and standardization. 

> You'll note that we have defined an interface for manifest which we'd be happy to move to the manifest core spec. Perhaps this object could be returned as part of the install events?
> 

Yes. Please immediately remove that from the web payments spec and file a bug on this spec. 

> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> 


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/452#issuecomment-210176966