Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Rename custom tag (#434)

Although those are somewhat reasonable suggestions, I'd really rather not drag out this Bikeshed too long. They don't seem sufficiently better than "customized builtin element" and "autonomous custom element" to be worth the churn. Each of them has something a bit strange about them, e.g. "original custom" is kind of a contradiction, "extended custom" is inaccurate since you're not extending a custom element, "primary custom" makes it sound like there can only be one, "basic custom" sounds like it should be distinct from "advanced custom" which doesn't exist, "fundamental custom" again implies some kind of non-fundamental custom element type.

I'd like to move on.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/434#issuecomment-207621431