Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] if service-worker-allowed header changes should active worker be potentially unregistered? (#857) from Jake Archibald on 2016-04-04 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:27:14 -0700
To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/857/205253312@github.com>

The best thing to do in this case is to serve a service worker that unregisters itself. We should discuss the kill switch at the f2f.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/857#issuecomment-205253312

Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 11:27:46 UTC