Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Inconsistencies due to when clients are created (#870)

Since we didn't explicitly discuss this, I wonder if what we came up with also sufficiently addresses worker clients. For workers their settings object (client?) is created before the worker is fetched, and that worker is then used as the client for the actual request to fetch the worker.

So would that be an exception to the `fetchEvent.clientId` represents the client that initiated the request rule? Or since it's not a navigation (but it is a new controlled client) would we only have a `clientId` and have both `reservedClientId` and `targetClientId` be null/undefined?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/870#issuecomment-213628649