Re: [whatwg/dom] High resolution timing for events (#23)

@wycats: @bzbarsky, @annevk and I discussed this in February this year and I think @bzbarsky in particular had a preference for adding another `eventTime` or `time` member given the compatibility concerns. 

However, since then Chrome has shipped with reportedly few issues so I was under the impression that this was proving to be Web-compatible and the extra member was not required. We can revisit that if there indications to the contrary, however. Although perhaps your point is that the burden of proof lies with those shipping?

(For the Mozilla position, that dates back to [bug 77992](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77992) which lead to me [proposing to add Event.creationTime](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014May/0046.html) to whatwg, from where [the suggestion came](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014May/0047.html) that we just try to change `timeStamp` and see if it works.)

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/23#issuecomment-214917899