Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184)

I see. Thanks. I think Blink can live in a world with option 3, given that DOM nodes are not leaked anyway. 2 is unacceptable, BTW.

However, I still prefer having new primitive by which we can explain the behavior of such a iframe.

e.g. a new attribute "XXX" for iframe.

On the top of it, we might want to explain the behavior of iframes in a shadow tree.

e.g.  XXX attribute of iframe in a shadow tree is true by default.


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/184#issuecomment-211221983