- From: jan-ivar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:46:29 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 23:46:58 UTC
> Provides a uniform spelling for requesting a permission so developers don't have to learn the intricacies of each capability's request function. Apples and oranges. If "permissions" are mere elevation-level badges (prompt, grant, or deny), then sure, all permissions are the same, and a uniform API makes sense (unless you hate Android's challenge model). But overload access onto this API, and similarities end. Why would accessing geo-location work anything like accessing the camera? They take totally different arguments and return totally different things! No developer thinks they can ignore these domains differences. > In Firefox's model, even if you request and get permission for something like geolocation, you probably can't call getCurrentPosition() without another prompt. Right, mandating the Chrome permission model (implicit persistent permission on access) is a non-starter. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/83#issuecomment-215266026
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 23:46:58 UTC