- From: littledan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:41:28 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 00:41:56 UTC
My take is that async iterables seem to be moving along pretty smoothly, and we have a pretty natural protocol proposed for it. It's nice to have this use case in mind in evaluating the proposal, which you can read about here: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-iteration . Streams do a pretty good job of exposing something that's sorta like async iterables, but more ergonomic to use directly, which can go and upgrade to them later, but waiting also seems like a fine strategy. Observables are still in more flux, with a pretty radical possible idea for doing them in terms of Promises and callbacks on the table. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/84#issuecomment-205561395
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 00:41:56 UTC