Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] if service-worker-allowed header changes should active worker be potentially unregistered? (#857)

To clarify, the F2F decision was to *not* unregister due to the service-worker-allowed header.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/857#issuecomment-208575721

Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 21:47:23 UTC