- From: jan-ivar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:32:26 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 22:33:19 UTC
@jyasskin The `request()` API is [still controversial](https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/83) as I understand it. I think my immediate concern is that the editors of *Media Capture and Stream* spec (which is past last-call) appear to think this (non-consensus) Editor's Draft's ***request a permission*** *algorithm* is something they can [normatively call](http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/getusermedia.html#request-permission) from their [getUserMedia algorithm](http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/getusermedia.html#dom-mediadevices-getusermedia) (step 7). Would the ***request a permission*** algorithm return `'prompt'` or `'granted'` in this case to signify temporary access? Would anything else be returned from this algorithm to the `getUserMedia` algorithm (like a stream)? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/93#issuecomment-215251365
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 22:33:19 UTC