Re: [whatwg/url] IDNA / UTS #46 "should" requirements (#110)

Interesting, yeah, I don't think that should be enforced. We should probably make this configurable in the IDNA standard.

I noticed the line you quoted mentioned transitional processing. It seems Gecko is successfully shipping non-transitional processing these days. Perhaps Servo can do so too? And maybe the URL Standard should start requiring that? It's still rather contentious whether it's a good idea though...

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/110#issuecomment-205173140

Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 07:27:41 UTC