Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241)

That is shitty, `rootNode` was kinda perfect. Even `treeRootNode` seems somewhat popular as a name. `furthestInclusiveAncestorNode` seems unique, but a bit verbose (`highestAncestorNode` doesn't indicate it could be the node itself).

Also paging @smaug---- since Gecko was implementing this.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-215962485

Received on Saturday, 30 April 2016 13:14:34 UTC