- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:29:10 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 21:30:05 UTC
Latest stats: * item from Location: 0.225% [timeline](https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/847) * contains from IndexedDB: 0.045% [timeline](https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/848) * item from IndexedDB: 0% [timeline](https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/846) * contains from Location: 0.0001% [timeline](https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/849) cc: @foolip @bzbarsky I guess the next step would be to try implementing the equivalent of FrozenArrayWithContains<> - an array subclass with contains() added which is frozen - ship it, see if it sticks, and then push that into WebIDL. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/28#issuecomment-211590848
Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 21:30:05 UTC