Re: [w3c/webcomponents] node.isConnected (#81)

@esprehn "inDocument" seems very similar to https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#in-a-document which is quite a bit different. Though that does explain (and I think we knew that already) why Google engineers didn't think a whole lot of HTML would need to be updated to account for Shadow DOM.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/81#issuecomment-206468504