Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Return constructor from customElements.define (#484)

This was discussed at the most recent F2F and decided against, although I don't quite recall the reasons. Maybe @rniwa does.

Personally I find this (and other "convenience" chaining patterns) distasteful as they violate [command-query separation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command%E2%80%93query_separation).

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/484#issuecomment-211543321

Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 19:37:11 UTC