- From: Cameron McCormack <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:02:14 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2016 02:02:42 UTC
> @@ -8390,7 +8382,7 @@ context.setColorClamped(-1, 255, 257);</x:codeblock> > <p> > The prose definition of a constructor <span class='rfc2119'>MUST</span> > either return an IDL value of a type corresponding to the interface > - or dictionary the <a class='xattr' href='#Constructor'>[Constructor]</a> > + the <a class='xattr' href='#Constructor'>[Constructor]</a> > extended attribute appears on, or throw an exception. > </p> > <p> That's OK. I was thinking: "The [Constructor] extended attribute must not be specified on an interface with [NoInterfaceObject]." or "The [Constructor] and [NoInterfaceObject] extended attributes must not be specified on the same interface." or something like that. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/111/files/4de2ba8da96b3127ff0160644734c20daece99c7#r61663066
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2016 02:02:42 UTC