- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:39:54 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 21:40:24 UTC
> Do we want to allow enumeration of supported dictionary/enumeration members? I can see arguments either way, without a compelling use case I'd probably prefer we keep this scoped to feature detection. I'm confused - enumerating the supported dictionary members is *literally the request here*. (Or at least, being able to ask if a given name is a supported dictionary member.) I'm 100% against anything attempting to be smarter such that it can no longer be trivially automated with no human intervention required. > I think we should do enums separately by the way. They are either ignored (setters) or the method throws, which makes them reasonably detectable. Apart from that, they would require a different API. Why would they require a different API? Afaict they'd have the identical "set of supported names for this type" API. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-212140751
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 21:40:24 UTC