- From: Mounir Lamouri <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 03:55:51 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 10:56:22 UTC
Hmm, the first iteration of the spec had `request(sequence<PermissionDescriptor> or PermissionDescriptior)` but it made the return type a bit hard to handle (ie. `Promise<PermissionStatus>` or `Promise<sequence<PermissionStatus>>`) so I planned to have a `requestAll()` and @jyasskin removed the union as an argument. @jyasskin any objection with me adding `requestAll()`? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/92#issuecomment-215048791
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 10:56:22 UTC