- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:58:17 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 16:59:11 UTC
What are the associated edge cases if we allowed the proposed syntax: `"a.b[].c"` ? What does the grammar look like? Is `"a[][]"` valid? (yes?) Is `"[]"` valid? (yes?) Is `"a[]a"` valid? (no?) ``` path := "" | (identifier | iteration) step* step ::= "." identifier | iteration iteration ::= "[]" identifier ::= IdentifierName /* [ECMA-262] */ ``` Parsing then leads to a sequence of (identifier | iteration); https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#dfn-evaluate-a-key-path-on-a-value would need to parse (not just split on "." then iterate), and if an iteration step is hit uses GetMethod(v, @@iterator) / GetIterator() like WebIDL and iterates/recurses, producing a key array. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/35#issuecomment-215809228
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 16:59:11 UTC