Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker lifetime and respondWith() with a user-constructed ReadableStream (#882)

> Perhaps we should say the service worker should be kept alive long enough to consume the stream. That makes the default behavior to hold the worker alive. It could be an equivalent optimization, though, to let the SW die if a c++ stream is being consumed.

This sounds pretty good to me, if people are OK with it...

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/882#issuecomment-209431994

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 13:10:24 UTC