- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:00:36 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Friday, 22 April 2016 20:01:03 UTC
So I guess this has been discussed to death elsewhere, but naively putting on my web developer hat, something that's in a shadow tree is still "in a document". Maybe in English: the element is in the shadow tree, the shadow tree is in the document, therefore the element is in the document. Have we considered "in a document's light DOM" or similar? It seems like regardless of what we do we're going to have to audit every use of "in a document" and figure out whether it should become "in a document's light DOM" or "in a shadow-including document". --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/238
Received on Friday, 22 April 2016 20:01:03 UTC