- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 23:16:38 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 06:17:08 UTC
Yeah, @domenic suggested we should maybe rename in shadow-including document to "is connected" in the DOM Standard too, but then it becomes inconsistent with the other terms. Or we could use "connected" rather than "shadow-including" as our word throughout? Hmm... --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/81#issuecomment-206711224
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 06:17:08 UTC