Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider simpler alternative to the "type extension elements" (#478)

@annevk Right, I was thinking about the earlier definition that didn't rely on constructors.

After having thought about it more, the API that I proposed doesn't really look that much simpler than what is currently in the spec (while being much less powerful), so never mind.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/478#issuecomment-204770493