Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Provide cache.putAll() method (#867)

Verging off-topic (with apologies to Jake), but in the context of discussions about transactions, I'm very interested in the motivating use-case.  Specifically, do the atomic transactions:
* simplify reasoning about what must be in the cache given the presence of other requests/responses?  (ex: It's known that "a", "b", and "c" are all put in as part of the same transaction, so "a" implies "b" and "c".)
* simplify the logic related to putting things into the cache? (ex: by reducing promise book-keeping.)
* other?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/867#issuecomment-206450937