public-swicg@w3.org from March 2023 by author

a

• Re: Proposal ideas for Activity Streams 3 Standard (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Is ActivityStreams Collection under-specified? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)

Aaron Gray

• Re: How should I query ActivityStreams objects containing both JSON and HTML? (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: How should I query ActivityStreams objects containing both JSON and HTML? (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Proposal ideas for Activity Streams 3 Standard (Friday, 31 March)
• Proposal ideas for Activity Streams 3 Standard (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• News: Twitter now worth less than half of what Elon Musk paid for it (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Sunday, 5 March)

Abdullah Tarawneh

• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Can ActivityPub be used for W3C Annotations? (Wednesday, 1 March)

Adam Lake

• A Holistic Design Process for Developing a Prosocial Media Ecosystem (Tuesday, 21 March)

Benjamin Goering

• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Content-Negotiation Issues (conneg) (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Is ActivityStreams Collection under-specified? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Can ActivityPub be used for W3C Annotations? (Wednesday, 1 March)

Bob Wyman

• How should I query ActivityStreams objects containing both JSON and HTML? (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Friday, 24 March)
• ActivityPub Test Suite? (Friday, 24 March)
• Content-Negotiation Issues (conneg) (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: A Holistic Design Process for Developing a Prosocial Media Ecosystem (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Is ActivityStreams Collection under-specified? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Is ActivityStreams Collection under-specified? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Thursday, 9 March)
• Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)

Bumblefudge von CASA

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 24 March)

Charles E. Lehner

• SocialWeb Groups (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 10 March)
• DWeb Fellows 2023 (Wednesday, 8 March)

Cristina

• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)

Darius Kazemi

• Re: Proposal ideas for Activity Streams 3 Standard (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)

Dmitri Zagidulin

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)

Erin Shepherd

• Re: Content-Negotiation Issues (conneg) (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)

Evan Prodromou

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Wednesday, 15 March)

gRegor Morrill

• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)

hellekin

• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Sunday, 12 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)

Jacky Alcine

• Re: Proposal ideas for Activity Streams 3 Standard (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Thursday, 2 March)

Johannes Ernst

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 29 March)
• CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 28 March)
• My wish list (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Focus, energy and people (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Wednesday, 15 March)
• "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Can the SocialWeb save Google Groups? (or, at least do what it should do?) (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Thursday, 2 March)
• Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Thursday, 2 March)

Kevin Marks

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)

mail@sebastianlasse.de

• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)

Manton Reece

• Re: Content-Negotiation Issues (conneg) (Friday, 24 March)

Marcus Rohrmoser

• Re: How should I query ActivityStreams objects containing both JSON and HTML? (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Content-Negotiation Issues (conneg) (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: A Holistic Design Process for Developing a Prosocial Media Ecosystem (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Sovereign Tech Fund Applications Open (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)

nightpool

• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: "Evolving ActivityPub to reduce infrastructure costs" (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Saturday, 4 March)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)

Ryan B

• Re: How should I query ActivityStreams objects containing both JSON and HTML? (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)

Ryan Barrett

• Re: ActivityPub Test Suite? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)

Sarven Capadisli

• Re: Can ActivityPub be used for W3C Annotations? (Wednesday, 1 March)

Scott M Stolz

• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Sunday, 12 March)

Sean O'Brien

• Re: CHANGE OF VENUE: Meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: Let's meet. Was: Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Should the specs be forked and maintained elsewhere? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Meta and ActivityPub (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Rights Expression Language (REL) for Activity/Streams/Pub? (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Reconciling theory and in practice -- do the specs need updating? (Friday, 3 March)

Sebastian Lasse

• Re: Is ActivityStreams Collection under-specified? (Wednesday, 15 March)

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2023 23:48:58 UTC