- From: Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:08:55 +0000
- To: "Sean O'Brien" <sean.obrien@yale.edu>, Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@gmail.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name>, public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKXmGHArhWhVjVx0hhOm8f5hrUtp+KQoV+Qm0Ew2M31GZ_i1wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Johannes, Many thanks for this, yes I shall be available to attend, and would most like to put a quick conceptual contribution forward. Regards, Aaron On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 13:36, Sean O'Brien <sean.obrien@yale.edu> wrote: > I don't like the part where people have to show video, even for a short > while. If the reason is identity verification, I'm not sure why a proof of > identity is an issue. Forced microphone is also a potential issue - just > let people acknowledge themselves at the start of the meeting in whatever > form they like. > > We will know people by their work as time goes on. No one is likely to > impersonate a member of this list just to volunteer on activitypub and, if > so, video won't solve that. > > For name, preferred or given name is much better than a handle/nickname, > IMO. Attribution in W3C docs is not by handle. Also, I think encouraging > nicknames in this context will get messy and not align well with email > collaboration. > > I assume item #6 is a joke? > > Live transcription is very difficult to get right in my experience running > online events, without hiring a professional. The plugins for OBS etc. are > terrible. Open AI improves this dramatically, but I don't know if folks > want their conversations fed into a data set for a language learning model. > > Meeting minutes should probably suffice, with video+audio recording made > available for a limited time. > > Thanks, > - Sean > > > > > On March 24, 2023 11:41:24 AM UTC, Melvin Carvalho < > melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> pá 24. 3. 2023 v 10:42 odesílatel Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name> >> napsal: >> >>> On 23 Mar 2023, at 22:34, Johannes Ernst wrote: >>> >>> > Can I see a show of hands who is planning to show up next Wednesday >>> > 10am pacific aka 17:00 UTC? Just trying to get a sense whether it’s >>> > 2 or 200 :-) >>> > >>> > Also, would it make sense for people who have a strong opinion on what >>> > should and should not be done to write up their core points in a >>> > (extremely brief) bullet list and post those here? >>> >>> I will attend and have put together a short intro below to set >>> expectations if you like. >>> >>> regards, >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> # Intro >>> >>> to the swicg meeting[1] on Wednesday, March 29, 10-11am pacific daylight >>> savings time. (17:00 - 18:00 UTC) at >>> https://meet.privacysafe.io/ActivityPub >>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmeet.privacysafe.io%2FActivityPub&data=05%7C01%7Csean.obrien%40yale.edu%7C665c65a93633414b0e9a08db2c5cd6c6%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638152549482230580%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k36WCncSeg9%2BFbf9XqiHVbE0uyC4PuNTVdgiMghZbPM%3D&reserved=0> >>> . >>> >>> swicg stands for 'Social Web Incubator Community Group'[2]. >>> To live up the term , let's be social ourselves in the first place. >>> >>> 1. be kind, treat all others with dignity, >>> 2. assume benevolence, even if it doesn't sound like, >>> 3. let's dedicate 10% of the time addressing societal impact as e.g. >>> safety, protection of minorities, human well-being, resource >>> consumption, etc., >>> 4. everything said and written is public and may be recorded, >>> 5. try your video setup 15 minutes prior the meeting, prefer browsers >>> from the Chromium family, >>> 6. wash your hands, >>> 7. pick a unique nick easy to pronounce and write for most, >>> latin+numerals work fine, >>> 8. if you intend to remain silent, prefix your nick with 's ', e.g. 's >>> Marcus', >>> 9. please join the meeting muted but with video, you may switch that off >>> later, >>> 10. the moderator should say hello to each participant and the >>> participant should respond, >>> 11. the moderator may use the lobby and deny access without argument, >>> 12. after you raise hand, the moderator may put you on the speaker list >>> (i.e. write your nick to the chat), >>> 13. let's stick to the time, i.e. close record[3] and meeting sharp. >>> Discussions may continue elsewhere, however, >>> 14. the record can emerge here[3] and be sent in plain text form to the >>> mailing list plus be mirrored elsewhere (put the links into the record). >>> >> >> I appreciate the thought that has gone into this list, however I think >> there is potential to draw from standard W3C meeting structure. >> >> I think the fourth item is especially noteworthy, and I suggest offering >> to scribe and produce a transcript of the conversation as this could be >> valuable for those who were unable to attend. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swicg/2023Mar/0124.html >>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-swicg%2F2023Mar%2F0124.html&data=05%7C01%7Csean.obrien%40yale.edu%7C665c65a93633414b0e9a08db2c5cd6c6%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638152549482230580%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4ek2wLtQVvHlCmf2%2B%2FY27fDOdRDHm0L1dtAb%2Bn6X%2BMk%3D&reserved=0> >>> [2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialCG >>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fwiki%2FSocialCG&data=05%7C01%7Csean.obrien%40yale.edu%7C665c65a93633414b0e9a08db2c5cd6c6%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638152549482386799%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3D%2FZiZ6zhsMnZWSmgeO9YXEQ2VrKvgt%2BAAE4DdI6Rac%3D&reserved=0> >>> [3] https://hebdo.framapad.org/p/activitypub-swicg-a008?lang=en >>> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhebdo.framapad.org%2Fp%2Factivitypub-swicg-a008%3Flang%3Den&data=05%7C01%7Csean.obrien%40yale.edu%7C665c65a93633414b0e9a08db2c5cd6c6%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C638152549482386799%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zsOTIxyLHODRooGBjxhSdWt5amspta1LHOGWbmYTolY%3D&reserved=0> >>> >>> That said, we have the >>> >>> # Agenda >>> >>> about 15" each: >>> >>> 0. Welcome >>> 1. Collect views on the future of ActivityPub (and related) >>> standardization >>> 2. Emerge with some sense of common direction (or be more clear about >>> where disagreements may lie) >>> 3. A couple of next steps >>> >>> ## Backlog >>> >>> - schedule next meeting >>> - i18n >>> - canonical urls for discussion, drafting, publication (mitigate link >>> rot) >>> >>> -- Aaron Gray Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and Computer Scientist.
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 14:09:22 UTC