- From: Sean O'Brien <sean.obrien@yale.edu>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 06:57:05 -0500
- To: Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name>, public-swicg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 10 March 2023 11:57:22 UTC
Hi Marcus, Tastes may differ, but this is not about our personal preferences. The cases I mention are some of the most direct examples of the power of speech in the context of Web publishing, and certainly not "fantasy of a naïve dictator. Totalitarian and encroaching." In the past two decades, use cases such as these have been vitally important in assisting oppressed populations, providing necessary and humane medical care, disclosing government scandals to the public, supporting democratic uprisings, and so on. We can consider these edge cases and ignore them. Or, we can consider the turning off of replies to a message as a valid choice by the author. That doesn't seem like a heavy lift but it's quite possible I'm missing something. Cheers, - Sean Sean O'Brien Visiting Lecturer (Cybersecurity), Yale Law School Fellow, Information Society Project at Yale Law School Founder, Privacy Lab at Yale ISP,https://privacylab.yale.edu On 3/9/23 12:55, Sean O'Brien wrote: > fantasy of a naïve dictator. Totalitarian and encroaching
Received on Friday, 10 March 2023 11:57:22 UTC