Re: Regular SWICG meetings and CG process

I noted two things in the chat about the minutes, which I think are missing:

1. There were a lot more people in the meeting than are listed in the minutes. For some time, it hovered above 40, and I think I saw 46 at some point. Could the minutes please be amended to say that?

2. Also, this was really a joint session with FediForum. It should probably say that, too, including that by general affirmation, it was informational and not subject to W3C IPR rules.

Thanks,



Johannes.


> On Mar 29, 2023, at 17:21, Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Marcus,
> 
> Minutes from the meeting :-
> 
>     https://www.w3.org/2023/03/29-social-minutes.html
> 
> Aaron
> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 20:59, Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name <mailto:me%2Bswicg@mro.name>> wrote:
>> Hi Aaron, Johannes,
>> 
>> happy you had an energising meeting today, let's sustain that momentum.
>> 
>> On 29 Mar 2023, at 21:38, Aaron Gray wrote:
>> 
>> > There were only 17 mentioned in the minutes.
>> 
>> would you be so kind and send the minutes to this list, please.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Marcus
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Gray
> 
> Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and Computer Scientist.
>