Re: ActivityPub Test Suite?

Lots more background in
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/the-activitypub-test-suite/290

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:23 AM Darius Kazemi <darius.kazemi@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If I remember correctly, coverage was not great for the old test suite,
> but it was still extremely useful to me as an implementer and I was sad to
> see it die. Even bringing it back in its old form as-is would be welcome.
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:17 AM Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> wrote:
>
>> The ActivityPub spec says there is supposed to be a test suite at:
>> https://test.activitypub.rocks/ However, that is no longer the case.
>>
>>    - Does the test suite still exist? If so, where is it?
>>    - Is/Was the test suite's coverage, effectiveness, operation, etc.
>>    satisfactory? If not, why not?
>>    - Would it be useful to either improve or replace the old test suite?
>>    If so, in what ways?
>>    - Implementation reports, based on the old test suite are provided
>>    at: https://activitypub.rocks/implementation-report/ . Should this
>>    list, or a copy, be maintained within the SWICG GitHub repository? If not,
>>    why not?
>>    - Was there ever a test suite for ActivityStreams?
>>    - Is anyone willing to work on developing a new/improved AP test
>>    suite?
>>    - If a new or improved test suite were to be developed, what
>>    non-obvious requirements should it satisfy?
>>
>> bob wyman
>>
>>

-- 
https://snarfed.org/