- From: Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:30:06 +0100
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
On 24 Mar 2023, at 14:35, Sean O'Brien wrote: > I don't like the part where people have to show video, even for a > short while. If the reason is identity verification, I'm not sure why > a proof of identity is an issue. no proof. Just human affection. Let the mirror neurons kick in. Seeing smiling eyes makes a difference. > Forced microphone is also a potential issue > - just let people acknowledge themselves at the start of the meeting > in whatever form they like. agreed, that's paramount. > I assume item #6 is a joke? No. Metaphorical. Take a breath, chill a bit, have some hot or cold or whatever drink. > Live transcription is very difficult to get right in my experience > running online events, without hiring a professional. The plugins for > OBS etc. are terrible. Open AI improves this dramatically, but I don't > know if folks want their conversations fed into a data set for a > language learning model. > Meeting minutes should probably suffice, with video+audio recording > made available for a limited time. Yes, I for one am more interested in results than noise. Concise preferred. Thanks, Marcus
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 15:30:24 UTC