- From: Darius Kazemi <darius.kazemi@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:21:50 -0700
- To: Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>
- Cc: public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADHc3QED47pR-FX4wEckASoCvCwtNmFfG1wWAtCpsmBsw2yu=Q@mail.gmail.com>
If I remember correctly, coverage was not great for the old test suite, but it was still extremely useful to me as an implementer and I was sad to see it die. Even bringing it back in its old form as-is would be welcome. On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:17 AM Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> wrote: > The ActivityPub spec says there is supposed to be a test suite at: > https://test.activitypub.rocks/ However, that is no longer the case. > > - Does the test suite still exist? If so, where is it? > - Is/Was the test suite's coverage, effectiveness, operation, etc. > satisfactory? If not, why not? > - Would it be useful to either improve or replace the old test suite? > If so, in what ways? > - Implementation reports, based on the old test suite are provided at: > https://activitypub.rocks/implementation-report/ . Should this list, > or a copy, be maintained within the SWICG GitHub repository? If not, why > not? > - Was there ever a test suite for ActivityStreams? > - Is anyone willing to work on developing a new/improved AP test suite? > - If a new or improved test suite were to be developed, what > non-obvious requirements should it satisfy? > > bob wyman > >
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 18:22:31 UTC