public-prov-wg@w3.org from August 2011 by thread

PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 01 Sep 2011 Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 31 August)

PROV-ISSUE-84 (namespace-for-properties): What should namespace for properties be? [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 26 August)

Provenance requirements for RDF named graphs Satya Sahoo (Thursday, 25 August)

formal semantics strawman James Cheney (Thursday, 25 August)

Provenance model document is over-complicated and hard to understand Graham Klyne (Thursday, 25 August)

ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 25 August)

PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 25 August)

PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 24 August)

[PAQ] rel="me" Paul Groth (Wednesday, 24 August)

Weekly Connection Task Force Call - each Monday Eric Stephan (Wednesday, 24 August)

PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 25 August 2011 Luc Moreau (Wednesday, 24 August)

PROV-ISSUE-80 (about-provenance-template): Query about provenance template [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 23 August)

PROV-ISSUE-79 (provenance-uri-contract): what is the contract associated with provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 23 August)

Guidelines for the Connection Task Force Report Kai Eckert (Tuesday, 23 August)

PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 22 August)

PROV-ISSUE-77 (paq-terminology): terminology issues [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 22 August)

PROV-ISSUE-76 (xml-examples): Shouldn't we have proper examples in XML and not RDF/XML [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 22 August)

PROV-ISSUE-75 (provenance-service-and-provenance-uri): What do we do when we get both provenance service and provenance-uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-55 (are-provenance-uris-needed): Are provenance URIs really needed [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

closing issues for the Model Document Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-59 (generation-definition): on generation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-58 (time-iso8601): is reference to iso8601 appropriate? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-32: Bob definition [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 22 August)

CIDOC-CRM Ontology Ralph Hodgson (Thursday, 18 August)

test message please ignore Ralph Hodgson (Thursday, 18 August)

cross-referencing constraints in conceptual model and formal model James Cheney (Thursday, 18 August)

regrets for telecon 8/18, 8/25, and stakeholder questionnaire status update Stephan Zednik (Thursday, 18 August)

PAQ document update, target renamed as context Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 17 August)

Updated stakeholders survey on wiki, need to compile list of communities to inform when survey goes live Stephan Zednik (Tuesday, 16 August)

Telecon Agenda Aug 18, 2011 Paul Groth (Tuesday, 16 August)

[paq] using anchor or different links Paul Groth (Thursday, 11 August)

playing with pil ontology Deus, Helena (Thursday, 11 August)

Minutes of Aug. 11 2011 Telecon Paul Groth (Thursday, 11 August)

PROV-ISSUE-74: Consider renaming target-uri as context-uri to be consistent with RFC 5988 [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 August)

PROV-ISSUE-73: Use "anchor" context URI instead of introducing a "target" relationship in HTTP [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 August)

PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 11 August)

updates to PAQ doc for discussion Paul Groth (Wednesday, 10 August)

Telecon Agenda Aug 11, 2011 Paul Groth (Wednesday, 10 August)

defining shortcuts and extensions Daniel Garijo (Wednesday, 10 August)

Connection Task Force Conference Call Kai Eckert (Tuesday, 9 August)

Discussion focus for the next two weeks Paul Groth (Tuesday, 9 August)

defining shortcuts and extensions Paul Groth (Tuesday, 9 August)

call for new question ideas for the 2nd implementation stakeholder questionnaire Stephan Zednik (Monday, 8 August)

name of standards - responses Paul Groth (Monday, 8 August)

naming the standard Paul Groth (Monday, 8 August)

PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 6 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): What is a PE? (was) Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Saturday, 6 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Myers, Jim (Saturday, 6 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth (Saturday, 6 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Satya Sahoo (Friday, 5 August)

provenance model document Luc Moreau (Friday, 5 August)

Meeting minutes 2011-08-04 Luc Moreau (Friday, 5 August)

PAQ: revised section on querying Graham Klyne (Friday, 5 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-26 (uses and generates questions): How can one figure out the provenance of a given entity? Paulo Pinheiro da Silva (Friday, 5 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-26 (uses and generates questions): How can one figure out the provenance of a given entity? Luc Moreau (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-44 (shortcuts): Introduce widely used provenance concepts as shortcuts in the model [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Thursday, 4 August)

Dates for second F2F Olaf Hartig (Thursday, 4 August)

PAQ: further revision of simple HTTP interface for discovery (ISSUE 53) Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles (Thursday, 4 August)

scribe required for teleconference Luc Moreau (Thursday, 4 August)

PROV-ISSUE-70 (provenance-term): PAQ document uses inconsistent terminology for "provenance" Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 4 August)

PAQ closing issues Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-60: comments on bob [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-62 (about-prov-language): about provenance language [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne (Thursday, 4 August)

PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 4 August)

Prov WG Telecon Agenda 04 August 2011 Luc Moreau (Tuesday, 2 August)

RE: PROV-ISSUE-56 (derivation-definition-does-not-imply-transitivity): Derivation as defined is not transitive [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen (Tuesday, 2 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of Paolo Missier (Tuesday, 2 August)

Straw Poll - Naming the Provenance Standard Paul Groth (Tuesday, 2 August)

Minutes from July 28, 2011 Telecon Paul Groth (Tuesday, 2 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-46 (where-is-D-in-provenance): Where do I find document D in provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Paolo Missier (Tuesday, 2 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier (Tuesday, 2 August)

Re: relation <--> property Paolo Missier (Tuesday, 2 August)

PROV-ISSUE-68 (http-link-domain): Domain of HTTP links with rel=provenance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 2 August)

[PAQ] editorial issues Olaf Hartig (Monday, 1 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-53 (sparql-query-is-overkill): can't we have a lighter method to retrieve provenance-uri, given a document uri? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Olaf Hartig (Monday, 1 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Simon Miles (Monday, 1 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 1 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-67 (single-execution): Why is there a difference in what is represented by one vs multiple executions? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 1 August)

Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau (Monday, 1 August)

vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT) Luc Moreau (Monday, 1 August)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:35:27 UTC