- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:33:22 +0200
- To: "<public-prov-wg@w3.org>" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAExK0DeJ7-ASSvGL7GJRD-akc0Wvsgx2j+==m+CEHqy8nnusRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Paul, I thought that this shortcuts were more a task of the implementation task force, (since they could be seen domain specific) but I think it is a great idea. If it is ok I would like to add them in the ontology too. Maybe we can add more of this shortcuts with the second stakeholders questionaire? Best, Daniel 2011/8/9 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > Hi Simon, > > I agree that we need a specific way of describing the extension mechanism. > However, one thing to do would be to identify what set of shortcuts we need > and maybe that can inform us what kind of generic extension approach we need > to define in the conceptual model. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > Simon Miles wrote: > >> Hi Paul, all, >> >> As a general point, these rely on the concept "is a sub-relation of". >> It's clear what this means in the formal model, because RDFS contains >> this concept, but it is not yet clear what it means in, or that it is >> any part of, the language/conceptual model. This is part of the issue >> of how the language can be extended to include domain-specific >> information, which might (or might not) allow new "sub-relations" [1]. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/issues/65<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/65> >> >> Thanks, >> Simon >> >> On 9 August 2011 10:06, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've added some shortcuts/extensions to the Provenance Model document. >>> >>> see >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/**raw-file/default/model/** >>> ProvenanceModel.html#**shortcuts-and-extensions<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#shortcuts-and-extensions> >>> >>> I attempted to define the following in terms of the existing constructs >>> in the model: >>> >>> Quotation >>> Attribution >>> Summary >>> Original Source >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**______________________________** >>> __________ >>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/**email<http://www.messagelabs.com/email> >>> ______________________________**______________________________** >>> __________ >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 06:33:50 UTC