Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]

• From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
• Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:06:09 +0100
• To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <EMEW3|a8a8c61cbe961bb3ab319e243096c80cn7LM6H08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E52C4C1>

Hi Satya,
This issue was closed, pending review.
Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we
close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it,
or create a more specific issue.
Thanks,
Luc

PS See note on this issue's page


On 27/07/11 01:37, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/48
>
> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
> Revision is a new BOB and not a property as defined currently in conceptual model:
>
> isRevisionOf(b2,b1,ag)
>
> The above description is already covered by isDerivedFrom property.
>
>
>
>
>
>    

Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:06:49 UTC