Re: PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model]

• From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
• Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:03:55 +0100
• To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <EMEW3|ae9b294b01bf8ac6e033c696e1e5ee5an7LM3x08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E52C43B>

Hi Paul,
This issue was closed, pending review.
Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we
close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it,
or create a more specific issue.
Thanks,
Luc

PS See note on this issue's page



On 23/07/11 15:14, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-40 (recommended-roles): Roles should not be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/40
>
> Raised by: Paul Groth
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
> Currently, roles are required for Generation, Use, and isControlledby.
>
> Specifically the following sentence is given:
>
> "Use, Generation, and Control assertions must contain a role."
>
> It is not clear why roles must always be there. In some cases, I may not want to assert the role that something played with respect to a process.
>
> Suggested resolution is to replace MUST with SHOULD.
>
>
>
>    

Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:04:39 UTC