- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:16:34 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Satya, I agree that it sounds a sensible approach for the formal model. The important point is that however we explain how to include domain-specific information in the conceptual model should match the way we allow it in the formal model. I am not clear how rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf translate into inclusion of domain information in the conceptual model / PIL, and this is exactly the kind of thing I was pushing to be clarified. Thanks, Simon On 4 August 2011 16:01, Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu> wrote: > Hi, > In ontology engineering we have the notions of a "upper-level ontology(s)" > and "domain-specific ontology(s)". The upper-level ontology - the PIL > provenance model in our case, is extended to model domain specific details - > the royal society details described by Simon, using sub class > (rdfs:subClassOf) and sub property links (rdfs:subPropertyOf). > This allows different applications to "subscribe" to a common upper-level > ontology and add their own domain-specific details as needed without > affecting other applications. > Thanks. > Best, > Satya > p.s: We did in the context of the Provenir ontology earlier for biomedicine > and taverna [1] - see Quick Links > [1] http://wiki.knoesis.org/index.php/Provenir_Ontology > > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: >> >> I'd like to add: >> >> I think it is important that when domain specific information is added, it >> appears in such a way that applications that do not understand it can safely >> ignore it and still be able to use the underlying generic provenance >> information. >> >> This shouldn't be hard to achieve, but I think it's an important principle >> to underpin extensibility. >> >> #g >> -- >> >> Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> >>> PROV-ISSUE-65 (domain-specific-info): How is domain specific data >>> combined with the generic model [Conceptual Model] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/65 >>> >>> Raised by: Simon Miles >>> On product: Conceptual Model >>> >>> Any provenance data will be a mixture of PIL constructs and >>> domain-specific information, e.g. file names, the Royal Society's >>> membership, the event of the RS's foundation, etc. By domain-specific, I >>> just mean things not defined in the conceptual model. It is not clear in the >>> current document where this domain-specific information goes. >>> >>> There are a couple of hints about where it might go: >>> >>> 1. In the example, the attribute values appear to be domain-specific, >>> e.g. "Alice" is not a generic part of the model. The attribute names might >>> be domain-specific, as I don't think "type", "location", "creator" or >>> "content" are defined in the model, but that might be a mistake in the >>> model. Can attribute types be domain-specific? >>> >>> 2. Section 5.12 says that "there are numerous ways in which location can >>> be specified", suggesting that it is made a domain-specific issue. I'm not >>> clear whether the list of examples, "coordinate, address..." are examples of >>> attribute types or something else. It is said that "Location is an OPTIONAL >>> characteristics of BOB". I'm not sure if "characteristic" is related to >>> "attribute", and if this is implying a generic attribute type called >>> "location". >>> >>> But are there additional ways to include domain-specific information >>> other than attribute types and values? It may be trivial to address, but >>> seems important to make explicit, else it is not clear how to apply the >>> language in practice. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 15:17:12 UTC