- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:52:55 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|352312bbb384e4b35ae1e459744a1c16n7LAqw08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E5226F7>
Hi Daniel and Simon, In the conceptual model (up to section 5), all relations use present tense, uses, isDerivedFrom, isComplementOf, isGeneratedBy, ... I agree with Daniel, we need consistency in the conceptual model and formal model. I agree with Simon, it's nice to point back into the past. Luc PS. I took as an action to poll about the use of tense. On 08/11/2011 04:46 PM, Simon Miles wrote: > +1 for "used", for the reasons you give. > > -1 for "isUsedBy". All other relations in the model link effect/later > occurrence to cause/earlier occurrence, so "isUsedBy" would be > inconsistent. This means that provenance graphs would not consistently > point back into the past of the thing we're seeing the provenance of, > and would be confusing to iteratively navigate. > > Thanks, > Simon > > On 11 August 2011 16:38, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-72 (DGarijo): Uses should be renamed as used [Formal Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/72 >> >> Raised by: Daniel Garijo >> On product: Formal Model >> >> Since all the other properties are using the past tense, we should be consistens and rename uses to "used" or "isUsedBy" flipping the domain and range >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 09:53:37 UTC