- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:03:49 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 25/08/2011 15:56, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Graham, > > Ok, I agree with that. So maybe this should be a model discussion. > > The main thing is that I think we would have more impact by supporting current > community practices. Yes. Having examples that show how (in best practice doc?) could help that. #g -- > > Thanks, > Paul > > Graham Klyne wrote: >> Paul, >> >> I think we need to focus first on finding common understanding and consensus for >> a simple provenance model. >> >> If we get this bit right, I think the representations for the kinds of use-case >> indicated here should fall naturally into place. If they don't, I'd consider >> that a problem with the model. The discovery process is a separate matter. >> >> #g >> -- >> >> >> On 24/08/2011 21:31, Paul Groth wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Have a look at: >>> >>> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1229920&ctx=cb&src=cb&cbid=vamttps342np&cbrank=4 >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you think we need to support bubbling up more of the information in the model >>> into the PAQ to handle these kind of use cases? >>> >>> thanks, >>> Paul >>> >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 17:05:13 UTC