- From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:27:02 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
> > I think other reasons discussed for introducing a target/context URI are more > compelling. Specifically, the requirement to be able to process provenance > information for HTML on a memory stick - i.e. to indicate what is the URI of the > Entity in the absence of other information. I'm not sure I understand this - Is this different than the idea that I create an rdf:resource with a URI to represent a physical object? Is the off-line nature really part of the target URI argument or is it just a third-party argument - there's a resource somewhere but we cannot add provenance to it directly (we don't own the server, the URL is not live) so we need a proxy - a target URI - that is online and under our control so we can serve provenance info for it? Jim
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 15:27:35 UTC