- From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:52:09 +0000
- To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
>
> In my opinion versionOf implies that there were some changes that we are
> aware of, and, therefore, the characterizations we end up with are
> describing different entities. I would therefore prefer to describe
> relationship between versions using derivation rather than IVPof.
I'm confused:
Given
A
/ \
B<---C
I would say B and C are IVPof/versionOf A and C is derivedFrom B - I don't see how you would choose "derivation rather than IVPof" since they do different things. (To keep going, D derivedFrom C wouldn't automatically make D a version/IVPof A, so one can't just infer versionOf from derivation, etc.)
Jim
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 12:53:05 UTC