- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:59:14 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Probably Paul Timothy Lebo wrote: > Should "Data Model: " be "Conceptual Model:" at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts ? > > -Tim > > > On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > >> The one listed in working drafts. >> >> see http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html >> >> Paul >> >> Timothy Lebo wrote: >>> Luc, >>> >>>> We have moved on since F2F1, and we have a document now. >>> A draft of http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/D1 ? >>> >>> Is the document one of those listed in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts or http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Model_Task_Force ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >>>> The question is which word should we use instead of BOB in the document. >>>> The text will subsequently be rewritten to accommodate this word. >>>> Regards, >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> On 01/08/11 16:09, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>>>> prov-wg, >>>>> >>>>> Are we headed to reverse the decision made at the F2F1, where we agreed that "Entity" was the thing _in the world_ that we were describing with BOBs, and BOBs were the topic of any provenance assertions that PIL would allow us to state? >>>>> >>>>> -Tim Lebo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Myers, Jim wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for entity >>>>>> *From:*public-prov-wg-request@w3.org<mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org>[mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org]*On Behalf Of*Luc Moreau >>>>>> *Sent:*Monday, August 01, 2011 4:01 AM >>>>>> *To:*Provenance Working Group WG >>>>>> *Subject:*vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT) >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Last week, we agreed that there exists only a single concept pil:BOB (name TBD) >>>>>> as opposed to two concepts (pil:Entity/pil:BOB). The group was also polled >>>>>> on different candidate names for BOB. >>>>>> >>>>>> The top three names were: >>>>>> -*Entity*(total vote count: 11) >>>>>> -*Snapshot*(total vote count: -1) >>>>>> -*Identifiable*(total vote count: -2) >>>>>> Total was obtained by adding +1, 0, -1. >>>>>> >>>>>> We want to produce a revised version of the specification with a replacement >>>>>> for BOB. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please indicate which of three names above you would like to see as a replacement >>>>>> for BOB. Only one vote (i.e. one name for BOB) per member. If you abstain, pls indicate so. >>>>>> Vote to conclude by Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Luc >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm<http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 16:02:06 UTC