Re: vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT)

Should "Data Model: " be "Conceptual Model:" at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts ?

-Tim


On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Paul Groth wrote:

> The one listed in working drafts.
> 
> see http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html
> 
> Paul
> 
> Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> Luc,
>> 
>>> We have moved on since F2F1, and we have a document now.
>> 
>> A draft of http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/D1 ?
>> 
>> Is the document one of those listed in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts  or http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Model_Task_Force ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> The question is which word should we use instead of BOB in the document.
>>> The text will subsequently be rewritten to accommodate this word.
>>> Regards,
>>> Luc
>>> 
>>> On 01/08/11 16:09, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>>> prov-wg,
>>>> 
>>>> Are we headed to reverse the decision made at the F2F1, where we agreed that "Entity" was the thing _in the world_ that we were describing with BOBs, and BOBs were the topic of any provenance assertions that PIL would allow us to state?
>>>> 
>>>> -Tim Lebo
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Myers, Jim wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1 for entity
>>>>> *From:*public-prov-wg-request@w3.org <mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org>[mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org]*On Behalf Of*Luc Moreau
>>>>> *Sent:*Monday, August 01, 2011 4:01 AM
>>>>> *To:*Provenance Working Group WG
>>>>> *Subject:*vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Last week, we agreed that there exists only a single concept pil:BOB (name TBD)
>>>>> as opposed to two concepts (pil:Entity/pil:BOB). The group was also polled
>>>>> on different candidate names for  BOB.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The top three names were:
>>>>> -*Entity*(total vote count: 11)
>>>>> -*Snapshot*(total vote count: -1)
>>>>> -*Identifiable*(total vote count: -2)
>>>>> Total was obtained by adding +1, 0, -1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We want to produce a revised version of the specification with a replacement
>>>>> for BOB.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please indicate which of three names above you would like to see as a replacement
>>>>> for BOB. Only one vote (i.e. one name for BOB) per member.  If you abstain, pls indicate so.
>>>>> Vote to conclude by Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Luc
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk  <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>   United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm  <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm>
>>>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 15:54:48 UTC