- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:18:34 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Looks like it.... Paul Timothy Lebo wrote: > prov-wg, > > Are we headed to reverse the decision made at the F2F1, where we > agreed that "Entity" was the thing _in the world_ that we were > describing with BOBs, and BOBs were the topic of any provenance > assertions that PIL would allow us to state? > > -Tim Lebo > > > On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Myers, Jim wrote: > >> +1 for entity >> *From:*public-prov-wg-request@w3.org >> <mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org>[mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org]*On >> Behalf Of*Luc Moreau >> *Sent:*Monday, August 01, 2011 4:01 AM >> *To:*Provenance Working Group WG >> *Subject:*vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am >> GMT) >> >> Dear all, >> >> Last week, we agreed that there exists only a single concept pil:BOB >> (name TBD) >> as opposed to two concepts (pil:Entity/pil:BOB). The group was also >> polled >> on different candidate names for BOB. >> >> The top three names were: >> -*Entity*(total vote count: 11) >> -*Snapshot*(total vote count: -1) >> -*Identifiable*(total vote count: -2) >> Total was obtained by adding +1, 0, -1. >> >> We want to produce a revised version of the specification with a >> replacement >> for BOB. >> >> Please indicate which of three names above you would like to see as a >> replacement >> for BOB. Only one vote (i.e. one name for BOB) per member. If you >> abstain, pls indicate so. >> Vote to conclude by Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT. >> >> Regards, >> Luc >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> >
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 15:21:24 UTC