- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:04:53 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Khalid, This issue was closed, pending review. Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it, or create a more specific issue. Thanks, Luc PS See note on this issue's page On 24/07/11 11:59, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/45 > > Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame > On product: Conceptual Model > > > If we agree that “isDerivedFrom” and “IVPof” are transitive, then I would suggest that this should be specified in the model working draft. > > khalid > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:05:22 UTC